The Harry and Meghan fuss

Instead of giving statements in a court of law he’s giving them outside his house. What a coward
He lied to the court as well as the leverson enquiry , he must be thinking what can i say that wont land me in court versus harry when it has been said by a judge he was dishonest in his evidence , squirm you fat ****
 
what did he say ?
He’s never hacked a phone, said he was never called as a witness for either side so couldn’t defend himself and people on court lied about him. Basically set himself up for a couple of libel lawsuits.

And of course he had to make a dig at Harry and Meghan about how they “trashed” his family whilst the queen was dying.

Hilarious.
 
He’s never hacked a phone, said he was never called as a witness for either side so couldn’t defend himself and people on court lied about him. Basically set himself up for a couple of libel lawsuits.

And of course he had to make a dig at Harry and Meghan about how they “trashed” his family whilst the queen was dying.

Hilarious.
Ha, **** bag is rattled
 
He’s never hacked a phone, said he was never called as a witness for either side so couldn’t defend himself and people on court lied about him. Basically set himself up for a couple of libel lawsuits.

And of course he had to make a dig at Harry and Meghan about how they “trashed” his family whilst the queen was dying.

Hilarious.
Of course he hasn't. Isn't it strange how he's always common denominator when phone hacking takes place. A slippery, ugly caricature of everything that is wrong with our media.
 
Morgan says he never hacked a phone or told anyone to do so. It doesn’t mean he didn’t know it was going or that someone else sanctioned the hacking and that he knew it happened, politicians answers. Also why as editor would you run a story if you were unclear of its source?
 
Morgan says he never hacked a phone or told anyone to do so. It doesn’t mean he didn’t know it was going or that someone else sanctioned the hacking and that he knew it happened, politicians answers. Also why as editor would you run a story if you were unclear of its source?
Exactly. The manipulative **** knew what he was doing with that wording. Almost as greasy as our erstwhile PM.
 
Exactly. The manipulative **** knew what he was doing with that wording. Almost as greasy as our erstwhile PM.
Its such a vague answer, obviously he hasn’t the technical nous to hack a phone but as editor is responsible for the stories. He either knew them to be true because he knew the source of hacked voicemails or made stories up which turned out to be correct. I know where my money lies
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top