Why couldn't a British Royalist black man make those comments? The fact you think it is not possible speaks much more about your bigotry than anything else. Which is amusing considering your poor attempts to pigeon hole people based on colour.Oh do one mate. Pretending to be oblivious. So by that stretch, Clarkson's comments would be made by a black man, yes? The Royal Family is institutionally racist, end of.
Because a royalist British black man wouldn't make those comments. In fact, I've spoken to a few royalists who don't like Meghan Markle, for reasons they can't articulate, but that's a world away from saying you hate someone on a cellular level. There's a specific demographic that seem to hate Meghan Markle. That's not to say all middle aged white men do. My stepdad, a middle aged white man, is nonplussed by the whole thing. As I was too.Why couldn't a British Royalist black man make those comments? The fact you think it is not possible speaks much more about your bigotry than anything else. Which is amusing considering your poor attempts to pigeon hole people based on colour.
Until your first sentence is explained because I find it lacking logic the rest doesn’t make any sense. If Harry had married a working class white girl for example and the story played out the same you are saying it is impossible that Clarkson could have made those same comments. You are saying the only possible reason he said what he said was because of the colour of her skin. That is simply illogical.Because a royalist British black man wouldn't make those comments. In fact, I've spoken to a few royalists who don't like Meghan Markle, for reasons they can't articulate, but that's a world away from saying you hate someone on a cellular level. There's a specific demographic that seem to hate Meghan Markle. That's not to say all middle aged white men do. My stepdad, a middle aged white man, is nonplussed by the whole thing. As I was too.
But reading comments like that make people take sides. How the fuck can anyone read that and wrap it up in any justification? A bitter, aggressive, outed bully has stated he hates a woman on a cellular level in a national publication. And for what reason? For marrying into royalty? For convincing her husband to move to the US with her? I'd hate someone on a cellular level if they killed one of my family members, or bullied someone I cared for deeply to the point of suicide. Cellular hatred is a strong term. All those comments have done is vindicate everything Harry and Meghan have been trying to address.
Another way of looking at it, Harry could have made millions in the US doing anything at all. He'd have been snapped up in any capacity to make hundreds of millions. The fact they've both decided to do this show leads me to believe there is ill-feeling toward the Royal Family. And if there's ill-feeling then a lot must have happened behind the scenes for these feelings to mature.
It's called nous, what other justification can people have for hating Meghan Markle?
Oh do one mate. Pretending to be oblivious. So by that stretch, Clarkson's comments would be made by a black man, yes? The Royal Family is institutionally racist, end of.
A bigiot?You're a bigot and an idiot.
Another way of looking at it, Harry could have made millions in the US doing anything at all. He'd have been snapped up in any capacity to make hundreds of millions.
If those comments aren't tongue in cheek, then it's disturbing. Deeply, deeply disturbing. In fact, the ugly neanderthal should be dragged from any airtime allocated him. But we know that won't happen.
yes, that is the issue... Clarkson is a middle-class dickhead? The ginger whinger is just a poor bo from BenchillIf those comments aren't tongue in cheek, then it's disturbing. Deeply, deeply disturbing. In fact, the ugly neanderthal should be dragged from any airtime allocated him. But we know that won't happen.
My first sentence is borne entirely from logic. If someone had slid that article in front of me, without me knowing who penned it, and I was asked to guess the type of person (i.e demograph) who'd penned it, then a Piers Morgan or Jeremy Clarkson would be the first type to spring to mind. Does that make me a shitty person? No, unfortunately it'd just be the likely, common sense deduction.Until your first sentence is explained because I find it lacking logic the rest doesn’t make any sense. If Harry had married a working class white girl for example and the story played out the same you are saying it is impossible that Clarkson could have made those same comments. You are saying the only possible reason he said what he said was because of the colour of her skin. That is simply illogical.
It could be true,who knows, but to state it is the only possible explanation is plainly wrong. And I’m sorry to say that is a problem you have.