Mr Bates vs the Post Office

It should be case by case so genuine thieves remain convicted.

Trying to post an eBay sale the other week was like getting popcorn at the cinema.

Punishing a handful of criminals who may have stolen a few grand 20 years ago in exchange for having unfounded convictions hanging over hundreds of people's heads for years to come is not a good trade.

In any civilised society, protecting the innocent and maintaining their freedom should be far higher priority than catching thieves.
 
This document in particular proves what your saying. After the Seema Misra case (who refused to plead guilty to the lesser charge of false accounting but instead attempted to prove her innocence of theft charges by proving Horizon contained bugs, errors and defects) this email was circulated.

They are literally high fiving each other that they have prevented the truth from coming out in Crown Court.

I would add that three days before the trial started Jarnail Singh was forwarded an email from a member of the post office security team stating that ‘discrepancies’ with the Horizon IT system had been detected at 40 branches. This bug had caused an apparent loss of £20,000 to show up on the system.


View attachment 103867
Reads to me as though there are three or four candidates who seem to be candidates for investigation for perjury.

Perhaps some lessons for any of us who are interrogated in this way are:
Insist on recording the interview and insist on having a solicitor present.
In court ask the investigators, witnesses for the prosecution and prosecuting council how many similar cases they have been involved in/are aware of?
 
And in the time it gets to process all those cases more innocent people will have died before getting justice and compensation.




How are Tony and Wendy Wellbeck these days?
Using Wikipedia to try and make a point!

And those condoning less severe thefts… I’d expect that from Scouse smackheads selling cheese for their next fix.

Fingers in the till happens in so many businesses.
 
Using Wikipedia to try and make a point!
Blackstones-ratio.jpg


Did you need a picture book instead?
 
Imagine if one of them was actually robbing the money all along?

Everyday must be like Christmas for them at the moment.
Why ? An honest professional investigatory body would be able to convict them..... or do you mean the shower of shit that the PO employ couldn't legitimately detect fuck all so just arrested and charged every one they could find and are now too scared to do their job ?
 
The beauty of the ITV drama is that it provided the element of human empathy that neither CW, Private Eye or Panorama had been able to. In so doing they made it relatable for the general public.
But it doesn’t have to be relatable for the general public, or it certainly shouldn’t have to be. What are governments and courts there for?
 
Why ? An honest professional investigatory body would be able to convict them..... or do you mean the shower of shit that the PO employ couldn't legitimately detect fuck all so just arrested and charged every one they could find and are now too scared to do their job ?

again that relates to my post yesterday - the bin dipper on the stand answered loads of questions before it dawned on him how deep a hole he was digging for himself. I was amazed he wasn't better prepared - just watch an hour of Sunak and the like before a Select Committee....... " I don't know - I don't recall - I never saw that " is the best if dishonest way to go so you don't want to incriminate yourself
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top