Why ? He's obviously had to accept it but it doesn't mean that he has to agree with it. They were prosecuting us and lost on appeal. He/ they are bound to be smarting from it.The **** is out of order with this statement.
He should accept the decision of CAS, as an independent arbitrator.
He's not really in a position to say given he played no part in the decision-making process at UEFA.I've just read the Telegraph article and it's a disgrace. The **** is saying that UEFA was right but unfortunately CAS didn't agree.
Sample quote:
We know we were right. We wouldn’t decide if we didn’t think we were right.”
Because that's the agreed process for appeal.Why ? He's obviously had to accept it but it doesn't mean that he has to agree with it. They were prosecuting us and lost on appeal. He/ they are bound to be smarting from it.
After all, it can't be easy having you're lying, twisted, arses, exposed in public.
I’m taking about the allegation that we disguised owner funding as sponsorships
He could have just ‘loaned’ us the cash like Abramovic, loaded us with debt, and saved himself all the bother
Been plotting out all the fingers that Mansour has in various pies as it relates to football
View attachment 104944
As you can see he has a partnership with RedBird with his IMI company not sure if it’s RedBird IMI who has shared in Fenway though
Of course they can. One side always comes out feeling they've been wronged. That's the way the world turns.Because that's the agreed process for appeal.
Just because they lost, he can't then blame the outcome of their defined process.
Precisely. The allegations simply didn’t make sense.Ah. No he couldn’t have done that, as it wouldn’t have gone on the P&L.
Thats what has always bugged me a bit about the accusation. If he did pay it on behalf of the sponsors, then the benefit is really for them and not us.
He's either taken the bait from the Telegraph or he's done it to bring even more attention to our case with the PL.Of course they can. One side always comes out feeling they've been wronged.
Just so there is no doubt what this interview was about in relation to us (it covers a lot of other things and we feature strongly in the multi club ownership bit) this is the actual headline:
We know we were right’: Uefa chief Aleksander Ceferin sure of Man City’s FFP guilt
But he is a supposed lawyer who doesn't respect the courts decision and is CEO of a governing organisation. Not the man in the street who claims he was fitted up.Of course they can. One side always comes out feeling they've been wronged.
They sold Kane to pay for it...Did Spurs repay that £100m ( or whatever it was) loan to the government?
Fuck him. He's pissing in the wind.He's either taken the bait from the Telegraph or he's done it to bring even more attention to our case with the PL.
Either way, IMO as the head of a governing body and lawyer he should have not commented.
Precisely. The allegations simply didn’t make sense.
Here are the quotes.But he is a supposed lawyer who doesn't respect the courts decision and is CEO of a governing organisation. Not the man in the street who claims he was fitted up.
I don’t followPrecisely. The allegations simply didn’t make sense.