PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[mac]

Yep, most i have talked to believe we are cheats, even people who dont follow football call us cheats, the damage has already been done and nothing will ever change their views, we are already guilty in many peoples eyes.
Even if nothing comes from The PL charges, it will be looked upon as if weve got away with it, yet again, due to having dodgy lawyers, bribing people or on technicalities.
Personally, i dont think the PL can survive us not being nailed to the post.

If we had dodgy lawyers we should be fucked. It should be we have the best lawyers who can bribe the dodgy lawyers of the fa.

 

[Rory Bluelow]

A few minutes after the final whistle. Scum bags. Time to defund the buggers.

Huge numbers of people have already “defunded” the BBC. They’re a pale shadow of what they used to be, slowly going down the pan as an obsolete relic.

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

All those bitter jealous cunts castigating us as cheats should look up the word 'alleged'.

 

[jrb]

Question.

Does it have to be the majority of the charges to be found guilty, or does it just have to be 1 particular charge out of the 108 charges to be found guilty?

Aren’t some of the charges laughable, and they should haven’t been added? Just to make up the number of charges to make the club look even worse?

 

[INDEEDY DEEDY]

Ros Atkins is a twat.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Up the blues! The haters will hate. Best time of our lives. What a club.

 

[Bez]

If you can't beat us on the pitch conduct a smear campaign instead to destroy the moment. Sad, but predictable. Whilst we are winning, opponent fans will continue to default to the cheating label that has been repeatedly presented by the press. Come on City.

 

[Centurions]

Question.

Does it have to be the majority of the charges to be found guilty, or does it just have to be 1 particular charge out of the 108 charges to be found guilty?

Aren’t some of the charges laughable, and they should haven’t been added? Just to make up the number of charges to make the club look even worse?

Regardless of the number of charges, if you're found guilty of just 1 then you're guilty of that particular charge only. It could be that I've missed your point entirely though.

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

Question.

Does it have to be the majority of the charges to be found guilty, or does it just have to be 1 particular charge out of the 108 charges to be found guilty?

Aren’t some of the charges laughable, and they should haven’t been added? Just to make up the number of charges to make the club look even worse?

It's basically a handful of charges over numerous years. But saying there are say 5 charges isn't as juicy as 115.

 

[urban genie]

Question.

Does it have to be the majority of the charges to be found guilty, or does it just have to be 1 particular charge out of the 108 charges to be found guilty?

Aren’t some of the charges laughable, and they should haven’t been added? Just to make up the number of charges to make the club look even worse?

most are duplicate or the same charge so there is roughly really onlyv5 in total plus one charge of failing to co-operate, only the last one will stick and a fine isssued most likely