Rishi Sunak

kaz7 said:
Sunak could have squashed this row yesterday by not stooping so low in a bid to get at starmer , being trans is nothing to do with politics , the media were obsessed with the trick q of what defines a woman . Brinanna's dad is furious with him
Click to expand...
He could have just answered Starmer's question about the NHS. A novel idea for Prime Minister's Questions, I know!
 
Johnny Mars Bar said:
This guy...when he's so deep in a hole, someone offers him a ladder and he just falls off it and hits himself on the head again with a shovel, like something from Looney Tunes.
Click to expand...
Ahhh but, but, but, he falls off the ladder not just because he is a thick, fudge nugget but also because his thin, weedy, little legs won't support his oversized egotistical head (and body). ;-)





whoops, sorry shouldn't diss the Prime Minister should I........... well actually I'd rather push him down that hole myself. :-)
 
Dubai Blue said:
He could have just answered Starmer's question about the NHS. A novel idea for Prime Minister's Questions, I know!
Click to expand...
His issue is he has a script and by golly gosh he’s going to stick to it even if it makes everything he’s says sound like gobbledegook.
Nobody can fail to answer the sheer amount of questions he does without there being a valid reason. It’s every week, without fail. What comes tumbling from his mouth bears no relation to the questions he’s asked.
He, like the majority of the party are frauds and the collective sigh of relief when they are finally buried could probably power a small country.
 
Well Sunak. You seem so confident that Labour have no plan and wil take us back to square one, so why not put your money where your mouth is and call a snap election. After all, you don't want to give Labour time to develop a worthy manifesto do you?

But we all know why you won't you pathetic cretin
 
Last edited:
mosssideblue said:
Well Sunak. You seem so confident that Labour have no pland and wil take us back to square one, so why not put your money where your mouth is and call a snap election. After all, you don't want to give Labour time to develop a worthy mnifesto do you?

But we all know why you won't you pathetic cretin
Click to expand...
Maybe we could have whip round and bet him £1,000 he hasn't got the balls to call an election?
 
Phil1 said:
His issue is he has a script and by golly gosh he’s going to stick to it even if it makes everything he’s says sound like gobbledegook.
Click to expand...

Yeah but poor writers of said script don't help him. Many a fine actor has given a poor performance due to a bad script and Sunak remains true to form
 
Blue and true said:
And I can confidently assure you that school will be an exception. Not a rule.

Assuming of course Jon Ronson, a known satirist, wasn't being tongue in cheek.
Click to expand...
The one thing Jon Ronson is not is a satirist. He's an investigative journalist in the 'gonzo' style of journalism (look it up). There's a world of difference.
 
He just doesn't get it.
The honest answer is " if we are speaking about dentistry I don't use an NHS dentist I go privately as do a huge proportion of the UK population (avoid saying because they have to ) so this is about us providing for those who choose not to or who cannot afford to "
Instead we get a word soup answer that makes him look out of touch. Who is his adviser? Caligula?

 
bluethrunthru said:
He just doesn't get it.
The honest answer is " if we are speaking about dentistry I don't use an NHS dentist I go privately as do a huge proportion of the UK population (avoid saying because they have to ) so this is about us providing for those who choose not to or who cannot afford to "
Instead we get a word soup answer that makes him look out of touch. Who is his adviser? Caligula?

Click to expand...

Why is it that they’ve done absolutely nothing for public services for the entirety of the time they’ve been in government then all of a sudden they’ve found all this money that won‘t solve the issue, probably won’t even be delivered, but may make them look good for a few minutes in the public eye?

Call be cynical but it very much looks like Sunak has taken all the cancelled HS2 money, as well as the extra tax revenue we’ve been paying due to the higher cost of living, and used it to fund many of the policies that Labour have been bringing to the fore in order to make the country believe that they aren’t all the cunts that many see them as.
 
bluethrunthru said:
He just doesn't get it.
The honest answer is " if we are speaking about dentistry I don't use an NHS dentist I go privately as do a huge proportion of the UK population (avoid saying because they have to ) so this is about us providing for those who choose not to or who cannot afford to "
Instead we get a word soup answer that makes him look out of touch. Who is his adviser? Caligula?

Click to expand...

They only ever talk about the number (2.5m) of appointments, not the number of actual dentists required to conduct these appointments.
Have they planted a dentist tree next to the money tree?
 
Bodicoteblue said:
They only ever talk about the number (2.5m) of appointments, not the number of actual dentists required to conduct these appointments.
Have they planted a dentist tree next to the money tree?
Click to expand...
Probably. It’s competing for sunlight with the doctor, nurses, carers, police officer, armed forces and other trees. The transparent, cynical and insulting ongoing discovery of pots of cash to create half baked long term ‘solutions’ like the recent cash for nursery places is simply desperate. They have hollowed so much out it will take decades to put right.
Starmer and labour have shortcomings but just vote these jokers out when the time comes.
 
meltonblue said:
Whilst I get this, imagine how trans people feel with the pontification about them, they’re all either rapists or changing their gender to be better at sports…

Any societal fix has to come from a starting point of empathy, think there’s a lot of people on all sides of the debate a long way away from that at the mo.
Click to expand...

Well for a start that first paragraph is a lie, on here for instance the vast majority have no problem with people changing their name or dressing as they like . The debate is about certain subjects like toilets sports prisons.

If the subject is so straightforward then one wonders how people like Sturgeon and others when questioned manage to look so clueless when discussing the subject.
 
Eebo said:
Maybe we could have whip round and bet him £1,000 he hasn't got the balls to call an election?
Click to expand...
Naughty.

Starmer: "He thinks I can't define what a woman is. I know he doesn't have the balls to call an election."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top