PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I'm not saying Tolmie is wrong but he's taking a risk in posting this information. A lot of people will be getting their hopes up now. This needs to be rock-solid.
I’m sure he has passed on what he heard in good faith, however this goes against everything all the people with relevant experience in these matters have said.

For example if true it completely proves the theory that the IC isn’t independent at all which we’re told is impossible.

More likely a club official spouting their personal opinion rather than fact
 
He had been let go/banned by City at the time and was trying to stay relevant, he took a massive gamble calling the verdict and he burnt whatever bridges he had left at the club in doing so.

Not even City knew the verdict when he was tweeting the words “exonerated”.

He took a punt and was 99% correct

why was he banned from city?
 
I’m sure he has passed on what he heard in good faith, however this goes against everything all the people with relevant experience in these matters have said.

For example if true it completely proves the theory that the IC isn’t independent at all which we’re told is impossible.

More likely a club official spouting their personal opinion rather than fact
I can't see how you've reached that conclusion?
 
Cheers mate. I got to the end and caught up with the thread, so I seen Tolmies deleted post. I just got a little excited, as I was working my way through.
 
why was he banned from city?
I’m sure someone will fill me in if I wrong but it was something to do when football resumed behind closed doors during COVID. The club wouldn’t let him in as he technically wasn’t an official journalist or something to that effect. He had a whinge online/in podcast in retaliation and has basically burnt all bridges he had
 
I can't see how you've reached that conclusion?
Because Tolmies source was saying the IC had concerns over the charges levied when City had give the evidence required?

How would a club official from another club know that? They wouldn’t unless the IC isn’t independent/impartial which were told by the legal beagles on here that in nigh impossible and fanciful
 
Because Tolmies source was saying the IC had concerns over the charges levied when City had give the evidence required?

How would a club official from another club know that? They wouldn’t unless the IC isn’t independent/impartial which were told by the legal beagles on here that in nigh impossible and fanciful
If the leak occurred it could have come from either side as there'll be still be a lot of people involved. Wherever it came from it still doesn't follow that the IC are not independent/impartial.
 
If the leak occurred it could have come from either side as there'll be still be a lot of people involved. Wherever it came from it still doesn't follow that the IC are not independent/impartial.
What I’m saying is Tolmie has passed on info he’s heard in good faith but it basically just someone’s opinion from another club and should be taken as such

There is no way the IC has said to anyone at this stage what the source stating they have
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top