PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Imagine if Spurs had 643m to spend.

The Kane transfer has given the £100m of pure profit. They have loads available to spend. They won’t mind. They’ll just charge pensioners fill whack to watch them finish 6th.

 

[Rory Bluelow]

Because he is a moron?

Fairy nuff. Good answer.

 

[deano ou812]

How can Neville keep making snide remarks that our turnover isn't real? In effect accusing Man City of cooking the books!? It's was on the overlap the fans one! That's 2/3 times now he has accused or mentioned that when talking about clubs revenues he classes his teams as the one that's making the most!

It’s deliberate to whip up those idiots into a frenzy that we are guilty guilty,cheats,it’s gone on to long now for it to change,if the club is 100% cleared of everything it’s still the stigma of oh they have paid someone off or similar bollocks to that effect..

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

How can Neville keep making snide remarks that our turnover isn't real? In effect accusing Man City of cooking the books!? It's was on the overlap the fans one! That's 2/3 times now he has accused or mentioned that when talking about clubs revenues he classes his teams as the one that's making the most!

It’s too late for idiots like Neville, our club led the way on new thinking in the last ten years. A multi club organisation in the CFG that’s grown interest in City globally. A second to non training academy right in the heart of Manchester not hidden away in Carrington where former rag players now send their kids. This is producing the likes of Foden, Diaz, Palmer, Sancho, Lewis, Bobb etc that if they don’t make the grade City can get very good fees selling them on.

City have qualified for the champions league consistently every season since 11–12, United and Liverpool don’t do that and don’t get all the extra tv money from it. Winning 7 Premier league titles since 2012 also helps with exposure and revenue.

They like picking apart the Etihad sponsorship however it’s £10 million more a season than Arsenal who haven’t won a league in 20 years and have never won the European cup. It’s certainly at market value and probably should be upped.

We’ve got the largest indoor arena in the U.K. opening up on the Etihad campus which means more revenue coming into the CFG. The biggest endorsement of City’s commercial success is the COO now stepping up to CEO at the swamp, Radcliffe seems to think what City are doing is right and wants to replicate it. Fuck Neville, he still thinks it’s the 90s and still wanking over his Spice Girl posters in his bedroom.

 

[deano ou812]

It’s too late for idiots like Neville, our club led the way on new thinking in the last ten years. A multi club organisation in the CFG that’s grown interest in City globally. A second to non training academy right in the heart of Manchester not hidden away in Carrington where former rag players now send their kids. This is producing the likes of Foden, Diaz, Palmer, Sancho, Lewis, Bobb etc that if they don’t make the grade City can get very good fees selling them on.

City have qualified for the champions league consistently every season since 11–12, United and Liverpool don’t do that and don’t get all the extra tv money from it. Winning 7 Premier league titles since 2012 also helps with exposure and revenue.

They like picking apart the Etihad sponsorship however it’s £10 million more a season than Arsenal who haven’t won a league in 20 years and have never won the European cup. It’s certainly at market value and probably should be upped.

We’ve got the largest indoor arena in the U.K. opening up on the Etihad campus which means more revenue coming into the CFG. The biggest endorsement of City’s commercial success is the COO now stepping up to CEO at the swamp, Radcliffe seems to think what City are doing is right and wants to replicate it. Fuck Neville, he still thinks it’s the 90s and still wanking over his Spice boys posters in his bedroom.

Slight edit there mate ..

 

[BlueRockape]

It’s too late for idiots like Neville, our club led the way on new thinking in the last ten years. A multi club organisation in the CFG that’s grown interest in City globally. A second to non training academy right in the heart of Manchester not hidden away in Carrington where former rag players now send their kids. This is producing the likes of Foden, Diaz, Palmer, Sancho, Lewis, Bobb etc that if they don’t make the grade City can get very good fees selling them on.

City have qualified for the champions league consistently every season since 11–12, United and Liverpool don’t do that and don’t get all the extra tv money from it. Winning 7 Premier league titles since 2012 also helps with exposure and revenue.

They like picking apart the Etihad sponsorship however it’s £10 million more a season than Arsenal who haven’t won a league in 20 years and have never won the European cup. It’s certainly at market value and probably should be upped.

We’ve got the largest indoor arena in the U.K. opening up on the Etihad campus which means more revenue coming into the CFG. The biggest endorsement of City’s commercial success is the COO now stepping up to CEO at the swamp, Radcliffe seems to think what City are doing is right and wants to replicate it. Fuck Neville, he still thinks it’s the 90s and still wanking over his Spice Girl posters in his bedroom.

To Add

GNIAC

 

[ganganvince]

Exactly and Scudamore was no different. It’s always been down to the clubs. The difference potentially now is owners that actually want to invest may soon be the majority.

Hence the reason to move the voting system to give a bigger vote to the clubs with the longest membership. Liverpool, Everton, Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham and the Rags

 

[WRicko]

We might know that for transfers that have already happened but we don't for transfers that will happen in summer

But we do not need to know that

 

[meltonblue]

Hence the reason to move the voting system to give a bigger vote to the clubs with the longest membership. Liverpool, Everton, Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham and the Rags

I’ve not seen that proposal? I saw one where we were included rather than Everton.

 

[117 M34]

But we do not need to know that

We do as it is saying clubs can spend x amount of money this summer.
If they sign everyone on 1 year deals and pay them a million a week, they can spend a lot less than if they signed them on 5 year deals paying 100k a week

 

[hello]

. Fuck Neville, he still thinks it’s the 90s and still wanking over his Spice Girl posters in his bedroom.

That'll explain why him and Beckham fell out then ;)

 

[Stoned Rose]

A couple of years ago I did an in-depth analysis of the top 6's finances and how much 'free' cash each club could potentially spend on transfers, and Spurs surprisingly topped the list. They generate a lot of cash but Danny Boy chose not to spend it.

Until recently, their model was to only spend on new players what they got in for outgoing transfers.

643m though mate?

They should have one hell of a team then!

 

[M18CTID]

It’s too late for idiots like Neville, our club led the way on new thinking in the last ten years. A multi club organisation in the CFG that’s grown interest in City globally. A second to non training academy right in the heart of Manchester not hidden away in Carrington where former rag players now send their kids. This is producing the likes of Foden, Diaz, Palmer, Sancho, Lewis, Bobb etc that if they don’t make the grade City can get very good fees selling them on.

City have qualified for the champions league consistently every season since 11–12, United and Liverpool don’t do that and don’t get all the extra tv money from it. Winning 7 Premier league titles since 2012 also helps with exposure and revenue.

They like picking apart the Etihad sponsorship however it’s £10 million more a season than Arsenal who haven’t won a league in 20 years and have never won the European cup. It’s certainly at market value and probably should be upped.

We’ve got the largest indoor arena in the U.K. opening up on the Etihad campus which means more revenue coming into the CFG. The biggest endorsement of City’s commercial success is the COO now stepping up to CEO at the swamp, Radcliffe seems to think what City are doing is right and wants to replicate it. Fuck Neville, he still thinks it’s the 90s and still wanking over his Spice Girl posters in his bedroom.

Neville's a hypocrite - doubtless that he actually shares Ratcliffe's views and wants United to replicate City's model too

 

[terraloon]

I don't have a problem with rules designed to uphold sporting integrity. Surely, no-one does? The rules we have don't do that, of course, and that is the problem.

But that wasn't my point. My point is that the clubs signed up for these stupid rules, so they should be willing to meet them. We are told the rules have been good for financial discipline, so why relax them? And why should clubs that voted for this shitshow and then gambled on a financial penalty have any say on what happens when the stupid rules actually start to bite them? They can whistle as far as I am concerned.

And people try to tell me the PL is coming out of all this looking good. It's a shitshow.

Of course they don’t do that and yes to a degree you are right about clubs that signed up for it but like any rule it has to remain fit for purpose and ok many agree FFP was never fit for anything it certainly wasn’t during COVID so they changed the rules. Clubs lobbed for the length over which a transfer fee could be amortised so they change it. A
The £105 million upper limit was thought fit 10 years ago but my argument is that the massive increase in just utility costs could never have been budget for I believe , you clearly don’t, that the £105 million of allowable equity should be increased . It’s not as if many owners couldn’t or wouldn’t fund it.

 

[ganganvince]

I’ve not seen that proposal? I saw one where we were included rather than Everton.

It was part of project big picture still being touted by that nice Mr Parry

 

[KS55]

Sly Sports News saying the PL could punish Leicester for failing PL PSR last season, even though they are currently playing in the Championship.

It is Sly Sports News. Bear that in mind.



PS. The replies are hilarious. When are Manchester City going to get punished. Why haven’t Manchester City been punished. 115. Cheats. Are the ‘FA’ scared of City. Blah, blah, blah.

If they are scared of us, they are scared of the truth.

 

[BeerIsTheBest]

How can Neville keep making snide remarks that our turnover isn't real? In effect accusing Man City of cooking the books!? It's was on the overlap the fans one! That's 2/3 times now he has accused or mentioned that when talking about clubs revenues he classes his teams as the one that's making the most!

Ratboys financial acumen and brilliance is illustrated with his own club which he probably never imagined he would run without ongoing success at losses of £4.8m, season 20/21 and £3.2m, 21/22. Using the last figure thats c£650k per week down the shitter.
Lim is apparently on the hook for 50% so presumably Ratty and his mates are forking out the balance.

Rattus should keep his snout below the parapet on any matters of finance. Failed goat herding ****.

 

[halfcenturyup]

Of course they don’t do that and yes to a degree you are right about clubs that signed up for it but like any rule it has to remain fit for purpose and ok many agree FFP was never fit for anything it certainly wasn’t during COVID so they changed the rules. Clubs lobbed for the length over which a transfer fee could be amortised so they change it. A
The £105 million upper limit was thought fit 10 years ago but my argument is that the massive increase in just utility costs could never have been budget for I believe , you clearly don’t, that the £105 million of allowable equity should be increased . It’s not as if many owners couldn’t or wouldn’t fund it.

Fair enough. I have said before that I think the whole thing should be scrapped at PL level, as long as there is some control over owners and debt and the UEFA requirements still apply to European competition.

I just don't see, logically, if the purpose of FFP was to instill financial probity, why the limit shouldn't impose more financial constraint when there is inflation. More financial probity is presumably better than less no, particularly in uncertain economic times?

It's almost like that wasn't the real reason in the first place .....

 

[KS55]

Because he is a moron?

Remember, he hammered away for years saying the Glazers had not spent any of their own money but had spent the rags’ cash. Gary, the rags’ income belongs to the shareholders, not the club.

 

[BeerIsTheBest]

Ratboys financial acumen and brilliance is illustrated with his own club which he probably never imagined he would run without ongoing success at losses of £4.8m, season 20/21 and £3.2m, 21/22. Using the last figure thats c£650k per week down the shitter.
Lim is apparently on the hook for 50% so presumably Ratty and his mates are forking out the balance.

Rattus should keep his snout below the parapet on any matters of finance. Failed goat herding ****.

Month not week.