PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[mancboy]

The fake shirt producers in Asia have their finger on the pulse…….

Certain history clubs missing from the stores…..

I know it pays fuck all to the club but they only copy what the kids want.

View attachment 112700

who is the one next to the psg shirt, rags will be getting ideas about having 37 sponsors on the kit

 

[cheekybids]

who is the one next to the psg shirt, rags will be getting ideas about having 37 sponsors on the kit

Bali United….

 

[Blue Feather]

who is the one next to the psg shirt, rags will be getting ideas about having 37 sponsors on the kit

Let's go for 115....

 

[Pam]

Strip them of all theor titles since 1909.

 

[manimanc]

From Front Office Sports

Manchester United ⬇ The Premier League club has canceled the corporate credit cards of senior officials as part of a cost review process instigated by new minority owner Jim Ratcliffe to help the club comply with profit and sustainability regulations, sources told ESPN. Manchester United was fined $323,000 last year following a breach of UEFA’s financial sustainability regulations.

How much must they be spending and how close must they be to failing as that sounds like the impact of spitting in the ocean

But we got told by every journalist and sports outlet quite clearly it was only a minor breach
Are you suggesting it was bigger and that the media sugar-coated it and played it down?

Well I'm fuckin shocked I tell thee!

 

[mancboy]

From Front Office Sports

Manchester United ⬇ The Premier League club has canceled the corporate credit cards of senior officials as part of a cost review process instigated by new minority owner Jim Ratcliffe to help the club comply with profit and sustainability regulations, sources told ESPN. Manchester United was fined $323,000 last year following a breach of UEFA’s financial sustainability regulations.

How much must they be spending and how close must they be to failing as that sounds like the impact of spitting in the ocean

bloody hell, how much was luke shaws greggs bill.

 

[mrbelfry]

If you put him in the same market as Sancho 100m is probably a steal

In the same market as Sancho even I'm worth a fiver

 

[Ric]

Interesting, if true.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Interesting, if true.

And also scrapping the related-party sponsors and sister club rules.

Funny that, with United and Liverpool now looking to start their own multi-club models?

 

[Stoned Rose]

The fake shirt producers in Asia have their finger on the pulse…….

Certain history clubs missing from the stores…..

I know it pays fuck all to the club but they only copy what the kids want.

View attachment 112700

That Reni is mint.

 

[dadnlad]

Interesting, if true.

clear and organised

 

[I'm Blue]

Interesting, if true.

“PSR is not working”
Surely PSR is all about protecting clubs from going bust?
That’s what they told us.
“We don’t want another Bury”
Almost sounds like they were fibbing.
Hmmmmm.

 

[waspish]

And also scrapping the related-party sponsors and sister club rules.

Funny that, with United and Liverpool now looking to start their own multi-club models?

Self interest always has been and the media lap it up and point the finger at city for the last 10+ years!

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Luxury tax is aimed at Middle Eastern owners I assume? Lets see what twisted bollocks they come up with now. I am probably being negative though.

 

[halfcenturyup]

And also scrapping the related-party sponsors and sister club rules.

Funny that, with United and Liverpool now looking to start their own multi-club models?

They are all over the fucking place. Is no-one piloting the PL Titanic before it hits an enormous iceberg?

They have an expensive executive structure that needs to be doing a better (sorry, much less bad) job.

 

[Dribble]

Interesting, if true.

This issue being, how do these proposals tally with UEFA's current FFP/PSR rules? What happened to the synergy between UEFA & the PL they were touting literally a few weeks ago?

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Luxury tax is aimed at Middle Eastern owners I assume? Lets see what twisted bollocks they come up with now. I am probably being negative though.

If this goes through, it’ll help any clubs wanting to accelerate their rise to the top 6 in the PL.

Clubs in Europe will still need to abide by UEFA PSR rules, but ones not in it yet can spend what they like and pay the PL luxury tax.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

If this goes through, it’ll help any clubs wanting to accelerate their rise to the top 6 in the PL.

Clubs in Europe will still need to abide by UEFA PSR rules, but ones not in it yet can spend what they like and pay the PL luxury tax.

I really should have read it, but its the DM.

 

[wolviedinho]

Interesting, if true.

This is exactly why City need to keep our case from reaching a conclusion anytime soon. The rules have never been fit for purpose. FFP to P&S to what ever else the red clubs decide. Meanwhile city are crucified at every opportunity.

1st they tried to “get us” with rules that didn’t exist then they tried to change the rules to “ entrap us” and now because it didn’t work have decided to dump the rules to allow United to spend again.

What a load of bollox. Keep it in the discovery period city and don’t let them see shit.

Awful corrupt organisation.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

This is exactly why City need to keep our case from reaching a conclusion anytime soon. The rules have never been fit for purpose. FFP to P&S to what ever else the red clubs decide. Meanwhile city are crucified at every opportunity.

1st they tried to “get us” with rules that didn’t exist then they tried to change the rules to “ entrap up” and now because it didn’t work have decided to dump the rules to allow United to spend again.

What a load of bollox. Keep it in the discovery period city and don’t let them see shit.

Awful corrupt organisation.

I assume it has no bearing on our case as the rules at the time will continue to apply.