PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Kinkybyname]

Suppose we could argue that their comments influenced the panel

then you are risking defaming the panel members (at the very least) questioning their integrity - risky business

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

A Tweet from Tolmie further back.

you know which page?

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

Seen it @Centurions TY

Please be true

 

[Maintainin]

Resolve itself
Yes that means it's already resolved
As you were everyone

Exhausted itself more like!

 

[Sk@mcfc]

He could have at least skimmed the thread

Probably got board

 

[Big mals fedora]

Probably got board

You two aren’t really bonding

 

[Brooklands Blue]

Is “He was quite a character” code for he was a bullshitter and an absolute wanker.

I'm neither mate.

 

[Academica]

What news or media channels do deliver balanced reporting?

Well certainly not the one where half of the presenters are Tory MPs.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Tolm is late to the party. I was told this by a source very close to our media team at the start of this year. But I was a bit dubious, as I've been caught out before by City talking the talk but not acting. So I sat on it but it seems there may be some substance. Let's hope so.

 

[Sk@mcfc]

You two aren’t really bonding

I’ll whisk away

 

[r.soleofsalford]

I'm neither mate.

It would be very difficult to reach his levels of wankerdom.
8-)

 

[PPT]

Well certainly not the one where half of the presenters are Tory MPs.

My question was a genuine one.
There is no truly independent, balanced, objective, reasoned news/sport/media channel out there.
They all have their own bias and leanings.

 

[the talisman]

He is not a presenter anymore. GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue but if you prefer to be fed news rather than form your own opinion carry on with BBC & Sly.

Did they present both sides of the City charges?
You know, by mentioning the club’s denial and insistence that we have irrefutable evidence?

 

[dadnlad]

Tolm is late to the party. I was told this by a source very close to our media team at the start of this year. But I was a bit dubious, as I've been caught out before by City talking the talk but not acting. So I sat on it but it seems there may be some substance. Let's hope so.

You was just holding back to get more fish in net
Smart move

 

[Macca77macca]

Tom Peck's been deleting his Twitter posts about City...

Ha. He has been a right utter wanker over this. I used to follow him as liked his other work but once he showed is ignorant racist self I blocked him.

What pissed me off the most was West Ham have essentially been gifted a world class stadium paid for by UK taxpayer, that was not intended to be a football stadium.

He can go examine his own clubs irregularities. Tit.

 

[halfcenturyup]

One person who formerly had a lot to say about us a few years ago, up to and around the time of the CAS verdict was Conn. I just checked his past articles and not a word about us or the charges. His output has mainly been about Michelle Mone, Gove and the PPE scandal.

Any football writing has been about Liverpool - either Hillsborough or the CL final in Paris - or the Newcastle takeover. There's nothing about our charges, which you'd think he'd be all over, or our experiences in Istanbul, as he hates UEFA. Yet there's nothing I can see on either of these. His main contribution to the CAS hearing was the pernicious lie that City chose two of the three judges. His last piece was in Jul 2020, stirring the pot about further Der Spiegel allegations just after the verdict

I wonder if City, or their lawyers, have had a strong word, which may explain why his colleagues are so vituperative?

Vituperative? Positively contumelious, I would say.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

‘Resolve’ is unquestionably vernacular deployed by legal professionals when referring to the settlement of a case between the parties, rather than determination by a tribunal following a hearing - and whilst Masters presents as a bit of thick ****, even braindead punters can have a habit of parroting their legal representatives, if only to make themselves appear to be smarter than they are.

 

[halfcenturyup]

‘Resolve’ is unquestionably vernacular deployed by legal professionals when referring to the settlement of a case between the parties, rather than determination by a tribunal following a hearing - and whilst Masters presents as a bit of thick ****, even braindead punters can have a habit of parroting their legal representatives, if only to make themselves appear to be smarter than they are.

This is true, assuming the parroter is smart enough to parrot in the proper context.

It had occurred to me that the PL would try to settle but would the club, given the assumed weakness of the PL case?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

It had occurred to me that the PL would try to settle but would the club, given the assumed weakness of the PL case?

Depends what the terms of the settlement are.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

‘Resolve’ is unquestionably vernacular deployed by legal professionals when referring to the settlement of a case between the parties, rather than determination by a tribunal following a hearing - and whilst Masters presents as a bit of thick ****, even braindead punters can have a habit of parroting their legal representatives, if only to make themselves appear to be smarter than they are.

I'm told that, like UEFA, they offered us a deal which we rejected. How true that is I don't know but you don't offer deals if you're convinced of the strength of your case.