Mr Bates vs the Post Office

I'm sorry, we know it isn't going to happen, but every single one of these lying, unrepentant shitehouses who ruined countless people's lives need jail time. Their apologies are hollow and mean nothing. They're only sorry this has come to light and they're being exposed for the scum they are.
For punitive reasons you’re probably correct but I’d like to see the lot of them bankrupt and their wealth paid into the compensation pot, I’d confiscate all their pensions to leave them living the rest of their lives on a State Pension.
 
Watched this today and one of the highlights off memory was K.C questioning van de bogards ability to dispell truth, by referencing judge frasier of the high court who said said he would only consider her facting issues in the trial if these were unequivically correberated by documental proof:

In other words if she told them it was a sunny day, he'd have to go outside and check for himself : /
 
Last edited:
so whats the deal at the end of this hearing, do the details go to the court,police or a private prosecution
I would imagine the outcome from the findings will be a recommendation (or not) for further action ie, prosecutions as, Alan Bates has said if the inquiry do not initiate prosecutions, he and others will file for them
 
Jess was ok but Mrs Goggins went away for a long stretch, I always had my doubts about her!!
I used to watch Post Man Pat with my boys, about three million times, if I remember correctly. I used to love and laugh at the name, Mrs Goggins. It just sounds so made up and perfect for the character. Fast forward 15 years and I buy a flat, tenement, beautiful, across the landing I go and see what my neighbours name was. You guessed it, Mrs Smith.








Of course, it was Goggins and she was a sweetheart.
 
This enquiry should be stopped imo. It's a waste of public money. The Police should be brought in immediately and them and the CPO should be investigating and charging these people.
Those that hold the general view that the public enquiry serves no purpose are of course are entitled to have it. However, they should know that it directly contradicts the views of the people affected by this scandal-those whose lives were ruined.
After the common issues and later the Horizon issues trials had concluded the JFSA had 2 primary aims 1) Recover the costs of their legal action 2) To obtain a judge led public inquiry.


JFSA Public Enquiry.JPG
 
Those that hold the general view that the public enquiry serves no purpose are of course are entitled to have it. However, they should know that it directly contradicts the views of the people affected by this scandal-those whose lives were ruined.
After the common issues and later the Horizon issues trials had concluded the JFSA had 2 primary aims 1) Recover the costs of their legal action 2) To obtain a judge led public inquiry.


View attachment 116570
Fine, I just want to see the likes of Vennells and co brought to justice ASAP.
 
Those that hold the general view that the public enquiry serves no purpose are of course are entitled to have it. However, they should know that it directly contradicts the views of the people affected by this scandal-those whose lives were ruined.
After the common issues and later the Horizon issues trials had concluded the JFSA had 2 primary aims 1) Recover the costs of their legal action 2) To obtain a judge led public inquiry.


View attachment 116570

Its giving the public the knowledge that these people are innocent. That is its only benefit so far.
 
Trying to keep emotion and conspiracy theories out of it I am trying to understand the context of Simon Stone's comment. Over what period is the spending figure he quotes for? What are other clubs spending over the same period? Is this just player spending, and is it net or gross?

View attachment 116622
Wrong thread mate
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top