Explain please you've lost me ?
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again. Liverpool weren’t a rival on the pitch at the time and City settling for £1m was perhaps because we didn’t perceive them to be a big threat. They finished something like 8th in 2012/13, whereas we finished 2nd. If it had been United employees who had done it, we’d have kicked up a lot more of a stink about it IMO. It was a serious miscalculation on City’s part as the very next season Liverpool went toe-to-toe with us for the title and have subsequently tried to ruin us in other ways.
Plus could we have potentially faced another 115 from the ICO?Anyones personal data that was on that database could have raised a claim against us for not keeping their data safe, we would have been liable to them. Liverpool were liable to us due to the actions of their employees.
It was in both clubs interests for it not to go further than it did.
It could be worse.Jordan writing a book. Didn’t realise Ladybird were still going. Be in big font I imagine.
City probably kept it low key like a lot of other stuff in the belief it would soften the red cartels attitude towards us and make for a better, more harmonious future. They learned to their cost that you never trust vermin, you destroy them.
Amended. UrghIs this one of those, what a difference a comma can make, jokes?
Fullofhimself Fucking PrickJordan writing a book on FFP, sorry, I have to chuckle at that
I've listened to Jordan a few times over the years, the last time was couple of mths ago when projectriver was on TS. Even when details of City's case were presented to him, most of which was clearly above his head, he couldn't help interjecting to try and make himself relevant with little jibes against us.Yep. More likely that Jordan has been educated by someone who actually knows his onions. Now I wonder who that could be ;)
Fwankenstein Wuined My Life.Jordan writing a book. Didn’t realise Ladybird were still going. Be in big font I imagine.
You could just have posted that he's a thick ****...I've listened to Jordan a few times over the years, the last time was couple of mths ago when projectriver was on TS. Even when details of City's case were presented to him, most of which was clearly above his head, he couldn't help interjecting to try and make himself relevant with little jibes against us.
So I agree, he doesn't seem intelligent enough to have come to this conclusion himself.
I recall when the PL initially raised these charges against City, he was almost joyous. He has always had a clear agenda against us, calling us a Frankenstein club, with no acknowledgment of how in the past other clubs have also had large cash injections.
There was certainly no insight or even analysis from him at all into why the PL introduced FFP.
I realise that's how TS often operate, to create agendas and get people worked up and on opposing sides, to listen and to ring in, clearly Jordan is just an affable pawn in their strategy, often without the intellect to understand the subject or present a balanced view.
They never got 'Welcome to Manchester' so something more subtle was always going to go right over their heads.Just looked at the 115 thread on the caff. And there's a post on there showing the tweet of a video shot by a blue at Forest of our fans chanting at the Forest fans about their club's misdemeanours, and the poster on the caff criticising our lack of self awareness. You really couldn't make it up, could you? That's why they'll never be us; they can only dream of being us. Inbreeding really does have consequences.
*Goes to look for that "joke over your head" gif*
Probably the only time "this means more" is actually true.Sorry 6 years.
Fwankenstein Wuined My Wife.
The other clearly noticeable thing about this imbecile is that he tries to sound like he's a lot more clever than he actually is. His interjections on the show you refer to clearly demonstrate this. In short he's an oaf who attempts to be articulate.I've listened to Jordan a few times over the years, the last time was couple of mths ago when projectriver was on TS. Even when details of City's case were presented to him, most of which was clearly above his head, he couldn't help interjecting to try and make himself relevant with little jibes against us.
So I agree, he doesn't seem intelligent enough to have come to this conclusion himself.
I recall when the PL initially raised these charges against City, he was almost joyous. He has always had a clear agenda against us, calling us a Frankenstein club, with no acknowledgment of how in the past other clubs have also had large cash injections.
There was certainly no insight or even analysis from him at all into why the PL introduced FFP.
I realise that's how TS often operate, to create agendas and get people worked up and on opposing sides, to listen and to ring in, clearly Jordan is just an affable pawn in their strategy, often without the intellect to understand the subject or present a balanced view.
I completely agree. He isn’t very bright. Not thick, and could properly be characterised as pretty canny, but nowhere near as intelligent as he likes to project, as is writ large by his verbal output.I've listened to Jordan a few times over the years, the last time was couple of mths ago when projectriver was on TS. Even when details of City's case were presented to him, most of which was clearly above his head, he couldn't help interjecting to try and make himself relevant with little jibes against us.
So I agree, he doesn't seem intelligent enough to have come to this conclusion himself.
I recall when the PL initially raised these charges against City, he was almost joyous. He has always had a clear agenda against us, calling us a Frankenstein club, with no acknowledgment of how in the past other clubs have also had large cash injections.
There was certainly no insight or even analysis from him at all into why the PL introduced FFP.
I realise that's how TS often operate, to create agendas and get people worked up and on opposing sides, to listen and to ring in, clearly Jordan is just an affable pawn in their strategy, often without the intellect to understand the subject or present a balanced view.
They have no concept of how real Berting works. Long may that continue.They never got 'Welcome to Manchester' so something more subtle was always going to go right over their heads.
Dollars for donuts. What a ball and bat.The other clearly noticeable thing about this imbecile is that he tries to sound like he's a lot more clever than he actually is. His interjections on the show you refer to clearly demonstrate this. In short he's an oaf who attempts to be articulate.
The very notion (and provenance) of the term ‘Berting’ perfectly encapsulates the subject under discussion. We turned a subject of ridicule into a piss take out of ourselves, in a way they could never understand.They have no concept of how real Berting works. Long may that continue.