This might be correct. It is a sad and worrying state of affairs. BBC news should be a trusted bastion of serious journalism that tells the truth. If it simply regurgitates fake news and nonsense from the Internet then what is the point?If I had to hazard a guess, and their reply hints at this, I would say it is mostly AI generated giberish that is pulled from the internet to generate hits
No you haven't, I meant mootDid you mean 'moot' or have I missed some clever joke about silencing the BBC?
; )
surely one of the key questions should be “how does this get approved by the duty editor?”
The BBC should be shut down.
It’s a million miles away from a “trusted bastion of serious journalism that tells the truth”. And not just on sport.This might be correct. It is a sad and worrying state of affairs. BBC news should be a trusted bastion of serious journalism that tells the truth. If it simply regurgitates fake news and nonsense from the Internet then what is the point?
Until you consider the replacement would be commercially motivated & we’ve seen how impartial they are.
ITN and Sky News are probably at least as impartial as the BBC these days…
Not even hand shake but they’ll justify themselves for doing public service while hiding behind freedom of press bullshitThinking far too far ahead here, but if we were found not guilty later this year, what is the reaction of rivals and media likely to be?
Apologetic handshakes all round?
I don't know why people complain about the TV license. I bought mine in 1985 for £58. That works out at around 67 pence per year. Absolute bargain.they can stick their TV license up there corrupt arse
I couldn't disagree more.If we are found guilty then we deserve what we get. I won’t stop going or burn my ST.
My main concern is will it be a fair verdict based on an objective and non-partisan review of all the information at hand. Transparency is the most important thing here as whatever the outcome it is only going to lead to accusations of us paying bungs or it being a stitch up.
I couldn't disagree more.
The rules were a sham to begin with so yes I'll be disappointed we weren't able to find away around them and we got "caught", however I just can't be angry with our owners or the people running club.
The reason being is they've been up against pure, total corruption and have had to fight tooth and nail to give us the success we've had against a rotten Cartel.
I just cannot see past the clear and organised witch hunt.
Nope it's a lose lose situation, people will still say things like under the table brown envelopes etc etc we will always be guilty in the eyes of every opposing football fan and the majority of the media, cunts like Jordan etc.Thinking far too far ahead here, but if we were found not guilty later this year, what is the reaction of rivals and media likely to be?
Apologetic handshakes all round?
To be clear, the emails weren't dismissed by CAS as we provided the full emails and (presumably) the full chain. They did show why reading one or two emails with no context or the replies to them and then bringing charges is the act of an idiot.
Apoplectic handshakes all round..grrrrrThinking far too far ahead here, but if we were found not guilty later this year, what is the reaction of rivals and media likely to be?
Apologetic handshakes all round?
We are hated because we are winners, long may it continue.Nope it's a lose lose situation, people will still say things like under the table brown envelopes etc etc we will always be guilty in the eyes of every opposing football fan and the majority of the media, cunts like Jordan etc.
We are hated and probably always will be, mostly borne out of jealousy.
A poorly written piece does not properly convey the desired content.Because it's been published on the British Broadcasting Corporations website, surely people should expect some level of quality from them? Or even just basic English proficiency, let alone fact checking.