Ref Watch

I’ve read this three times and am still not sure if I’m losing my marbles or it makes no sense whatsoever?

eb8da85c6d77c5d54ae9daf037f69a6e.jpg


So three of them said the referee made the correct decision. But all five agreed the VAR should have intervened and recommended he changed his decision?

That is some weird shit right there. No wonder no-one has any idea what is going on.
 
Not that it affected the result, but why was the Munoz elbow incident not looked at? It seemed a clear and deliberate movement of his elbow to our player's head, which connected. I expected a var check for a potential red card.

Other than that they were good today, albeit he classic of booking players in the second half for the same kind of challenges that were not booked in the first half.
 
Not that it affected the result, but why was the Munoz elbow incident not looked at? It seemed a clear and deliberate movement of his elbow to our player's head, which connected. I expected a var check for a potential red card.

Other than that they were good today, albeit he classic of booking players in the second half for the same kind of challenges that were not booked in the first half.
He was too busy trying to spot the passing lines in the first half to book anyone.
 
I see De Bruyne went over Palhinha’s leg ala Havertz but no penalty. Dermot won’t be asked about that on Monday. Or the fact it took three yellow cards for Diop to walk (the grappling on Haaland being the one left alone). The red a massive 90 seconds before the final whistle.
Still, a damn sight better than usual.
 
I see De Bruyne went over Palhinha’s leg ala Havertz but no penalty. Dermot won’t be asked about that on Monday. Or the fact it took three yellow cards for Diop to walk (the grappling on Haaland being the one left alone). The red a massive 90 seconds before the final whistle.
Still, a damn sight better than usual.
Palhinha flicked his foot out.
 
Kavanagh on Tuesday.

Hard to see any trend with him. He is from Ashton Under Lyne but another non league fan !

I don’t recall any truly bad performances from him.
 
Can somebody explain to me the difference between today's penalty, which was nailed on, and last week's which was (according to Ian dickhead Wright) the worst penalty decision of recent times.
Both late challenges after the attempt was made by the attacker.
Many on here were agreeing with Wright, unbelievably.
Alvarez touched the ball trying to control it and continue the attack and was wiped out.

Gvardiol had finished his action on the ball (ie shot) and collided with the defender trying to block it.

The latter are far less likely to be given than the former.
 
Alvarez touched the ball trying to control it and continue the attack and was wiped out.

Gvardiol had finished his action on the ball (ie shot) and collided with the defender trying to block it.

The latter are far less likely to be given than the former.
No, Alverez made an attempt at goal.

And ait nouri collided with Gvardiol.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top