PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Plays By Sense Of Smell said:
Did he get challenged on why why the PL Lawyers think this is the case?

Maybe…just maybe, because there is no compelling or substantive evidence that would stand up to any reasonable scrutiny, certainly not in the face of a body if irrefutable evidence?

Lol.

He looks like someone who’s just gone and bought a big f*ckoff spade and is trying to pretend it’s because he’s an archaeologist…
Click to expand...
Sort of actually. He thinks City are refusing to hand over evidence, and the PL are fucked without it. The counter is that City aren't refusing to hand it over, it simply doesn't exist.

Either NH does have links to the PL lawyers, in which case this all very positive noises OR he's lying about that and feeling pretty negative about the whole thing. Win/win in some ways.
 
RayCTID said:
So is Nick Harris mad as an hatter?
Click to expand...

1716960062035.jpeg

Crazy, demented, as in he is constantly posting about City on X/Twitter; he’s mad as a hatter . This expression, dating from the early 1800s, alludes to exposure to the chemicals formerly used in making felt hats, which caused tremors and other nervous symptoms.
 
Brightwell Bros. said:
Sort of actually. He thinks City are refusing to hand over evidence, and the PL are fucked without it. The counter is that City aren't refusing to hand it over, it simply doesn't exist.

Either NH does have links to the PL lawyers, in which case this all very positive noises OR he's lying about that and feeling pretty negative about the whole thing. Win/win in some ways.
Click to expand...
Or the Premier league lawyers have been in touch with him and told him to pack it in, might be a reason why he started the magic hat posts
 
bridgeno1 said:
I don't feel I need to. That wasn't the point of my post. I was just pointing out that in the real world businesses (and that's what both City and the PL are at the end of the day) try to figure out what's best for their own continuity and come to an agreement so that both parties move on. What happens when the office nutcase tries to claim unfair dismissal? More often than not a deal is cut behind the scenes to avoid lengthy legal proceedings and bad PR making its way to that company's client and prospect base. City getting slammed isn't a good outcome for City but it's also a terrible outcome for the PL which is why I think it's the least likely outcome.
Click to expand...
so you are classing us as the office nutcase. go away in short jerky movements
 
Scottyboi said:
If he was asked how these allegations going back over a decade had any impact on the last 2 seasons he would be stumped. Pathetic excuse making for coming up short.
Click to expand...
Truth is mancini getting paid for work for Al Jazeera has directly led to arsenal losing to Aston Villa a decade later
How can you not see that

Btw sometimes when your 2-0 down at home to villa you just have to score 3 and act like champions
 
Tb1981 said:
Truth is mancini getting paid for work for Al Jazeera has directly led to arsenal losing to Aston Villa a decade later
How can you not see that

Btw sometimes when your 2-0 down at home to villa you just have to score 3 and act like champions
Click to expand...

Think that's why about 30,000 of their fans went up the road when Villa scored the second tbh. Memories of that 250 grand Al Jazeera paid to Mancini in 2011 came flooding back and they remembered their football club was no longer worth supporting.
 
Tb1981 said:
Truth is mancini getting paid for work for Al Jazeera has directly led to arsenal losing to Aston Villa a decade later
How can you not see that

Btw sometimes when your 2-0 down at home to villa you just have to score 3 and act like champions
Click to expand...
And I reckon Dickov scoring that equaliser at Wembley led to Forest beating Arsenal 1-0 for the 3rd in a row.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top