PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Finally got round to listening to the Harris/Stefan podcast and I was quite shocked to hear how little Harris knew about the 115 charges. He really, really wanted to talk about fair value, wanted to imply they were back on the table now, and had very little sense of how the whole thing was going to play out. This was only recently so has had plenty of time to get his head round the CAS case and listen to a bunch of stakeholders and experts on the details (as best we can work out) re: the IC. Really quite taken aback by how little detail he had given this is his life's work: there's a bunch of journos who have a better grasp (for, against, neutral). Weird.
 
Harris wants the guys details just so he can discredit him.
Whether the guy is right, wrong etc is irrelevant- why should he give Harris his details!
Like he tried to do the Stefan when he handed him his arse on a plate

Guy seems to have an issue with anyone having an opinion (guilty or not guilty) if it isn’t him

If your reading this nick as we know you do
You are a prick!
Crazy how he blocks every Blue on Twitter, yet clearly still lurks on here to read what we’re saying.
 
Harris wants the guys details just so he can discredit him.
Whether the guy is right, wrong etc is irrelevant- why should he give Harris his details!
Like he tried to do the Stefan when he handed him his arse on a plate

Guy seems to have an issue with anyone having an opinion (guilty or not guilty) if it isn’t him

If your reading this nick as we know you do
You are a prick!
Don't forget that Harris also wanted Rabin's details as well
 
Isn't an Harris another name for a minge in some quarters?
I'm sure a woman I was seeing from Salford yrs ago called hers an Harris on occasion
 
Finally got round to listening to the Harris/Stefan podcast and I was quite shocked to hear how little Harris knew about the 115 charges. He really, really wanted to talk about fair value, wanted to imply they were back on the table now, and had very little sense of how the whole thing was going to play out. This was only recently so has had plenty of time to get his head round the CAS case and listen to a bunch of stakeholders and experts on the details (as best we can work out) re: the IC. Really quite taken aback by how little detail he had given this is his life's work: there's a bunch of journos who have a better grasp (for, against, neutral). Weird.

What's fair value ? If I want to sell my car for 200quid and someone offers 500quid I am meant to say nah mate it's only 200quid !

Buyer is happy to 500quid I'm happy to take 500quid seems fair as both are happy
 
What's fair value ? If I want to sell my car for 200quid and someone offers 500quid I am meant to say nah mate it's only 200quid !

Buyer is happy to 500quid I'm happy to take 500quid seems fair as both are happy
City -ruining the Car Industry since 2008
 
What's fair value ? If I want to sell my car for 200quid and someone offers 500quid I am meant to say nah mate it's only 200quid !

Buyer is happy to 500quid I'm happy to take 500quid seems fair as both are happy
So I suppose if you buy a cup of tea off your son on your deathbed for the house and your savings you'll have a tricky time convincing the tax man that it was fair value. So there are laws and regulations in place. But as far as I can tell City, Etihad, the PL, UEFA and everyone else in between has always agreed that it was fair value, albeit on the steeper end of the system and obviously a result of City's relationship to Etihad. And the time since its proven to be of good value. But I was surprised to hear Harris still talking about as it doesn't really have much to do with the charges as everyone understands it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top