General Election - 4th July 2024

Who will you be voting for in the General Election?

  • Labour

    Votes: 266 56.8%
  • Conservative

    Votes: 12 2.6%
  • Liberal Democrat

    Votes: 40 8.5%
  • Reform

    Votes: 71 15.2%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 28 6.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 51 10.9%

  • Total voters
    468
Monster Raving Loony Party “Manicfesto” out today. Once again, they are the voice of common sense politics. Some highlights:

> Replace border force agents with GP receptionists. That way nobody will ever get in.
> As well as cars doing an MOT to make sure they’re roadworthy, roads will be forced to do an ROT to make sure they’re carworthy.
> Anybody using a self-service checkout gets a 10% discount for doing some of the work themselves.

And more!

 
I really like her. She’s brave and has made the most of herself. I think she’s funny too. She’s not hugely bright, but neither was Truss. Difference is Rayner knows her limits. I hugely respect her.

Thought the sight of a Winchester educated **** who stole off the country in 2008 who has an Eton educated Foreign Secretary, a Lord, who conned the taxpayer out of tens of thousands to both pay for the upkeep up some wisteria at the front of his Oxfordshire constituency home, and to build his wanking shed in his back garden, pontificating like that, truly appalling.

Attacking a working class girl like that because she might have misdirected a couple of grand was absolutely reprehensible.

Fucking rat faced ****.
Afuckingmen to that
 
Genuinely, I hate politics, they are all cunts who just have their snout in the trough.

I prefer to live life in my own bubble, what I do won’t change the world, and I just deal with life on a day to day basis and do what’s best for me and my family. Accept my taxation etc.

I find it hard to see anything in any of the parties or leaders that I like, we chatted last night about politics in our house with my missus, son and his partner, and I just wouldn’t have a fucking clue what anyone really stands for.

Obviously the tories need to be out, they’ve had a fair crack and fucked it up, but what do Labour really stand for? I can’t help but look at Starmer and think he’s a clown, so what should make me walk over my road in a few weeks and stick a cross in the box for them?

Genuine question.

Should add I’m 53 and never voted in my life.

It's yer classic 'lesser of two evils'/ full or half a bowl of shit' arguments.

Or you're a secret Trumper or some stupid mathematics...
 
I really like her. She’s brave and has made the most of herself. I think she’s funny too. She’s not hugely bright, but neither was Truss. Difference is Rayner knows her limits. I hugely respect her.

Thought the sight of a Winchester educated **** who stole off the country in 2008 who has an Eton educated Foreign Secretary, a Lord, who conned the taxpayer out of tens of thousands to both pay for the upkeep up some wisteria at the front of his Oxfordshire constituency home, and to build his wanking shed in his back garden, pontificating like that, truly appalling.

Attacking a working class girl like that because she might have misdirected a couple of grand was absolutely reprehensible.

Fucking rat faced ****.
I’m not sure that using Liz Truss as your benchmark is an especially good idea or particularly instructive. Personally I think that Rayner is absolutely dreadful, but that’s just my opinion.

I also don’t think that someone’s perceived class or background is of any relevance as to whether they may have ‘misdirected a couple of grand’ as you put it. Constantly banging on about what school people went to serves little purpose and personally I just prefer to take people as I find them.

Finally I assume that your suggestion that Sunak ‘stole off the country’ in 2008 refers to his time at TCI? An abject failure of regulation around RBS, encouraged by the light/limited touch approach of the Labour government of the day, is the reason why RBS went bust. TCI’s involvement was of no relevance, Sunak’s even less.
 
I’m not sure that using Liz Truss as your benchmark is an especially good idea or particularly instructive. Personally I think that Rayner is absolutely dreadful, but that’s just my opinion.

I also don’t think that someone’s perceived class or background is of any relevance as to whether they may have ‘misdirected a couple of grand’ as you put it. Constantly banging on about what school people went to serves little purpose and personally I just prefer to take people as I find them.

Finally I assume that your suggestion that Sunak ‘stole off the country’ in 2008 refers to his time at TCI? An abject failure of regulation around RBS, encouraged by the light/limited touch approach of the Labour government of the day, is the reason why RBS went bust. TCI’s involvement was of no relevance, Sunak’s even less.

Were conservative politicians calling for a stricter or more lenient regime of banking regulation?
 
I initially picked reform for a joke but have changed it to libdems (tactical vote, no point of voting labour here).

Unless others had a similar idea we obviously have some overt racists.
 
The only thing I want from this election when it's over is for posters to look at their constituency votes and the seats won and stop with the bullshit.

Oh I would have loved to have voted for...but it would be a wasted vote
I needed to tactically vote for...... so......lost

Listen you daft sods your vote didn't win anything or lose it either. it didn't put anyone in power and it was neither relevant or a waste in the Grand scheme of things.

Rather than convince yourself you have to do something because of consequences just sit down for 5 minutes and ask yourself one thing.

You get up.on election day and are so ill you can't vote, in what fuckin world would this effect anything.

You are Russell Brand and I claim my 0.000096 Bitcoin.
 
I’m not sure that using Liz Truss as your benchmark is an especially good idea or particularly instructive. Personally I think that Rayner is absolutely dreadful, but that’s just my opinion.

I also don’t think that someone’s perceived class or background is of any relevance as to whether they may have ‘misdirected a couple of grand’ as you put it. Constantly banging on about what school people went to serves little purpose and personally I just prefer to take people as I find them.

Finally I assume that your suggestion that Sunak ‘stole off the country’ in 2008 refers to his time at TCI? An abject failure of regulation around RBS, encouraged by the light/limited touch approach of the Labour government of the day, is the reason why RBS went bust. TCI’s involvement was of no relevance, Sunak’s even less.
Don’t misrepresent what I’ve saud about Truss, who is a perfectly adequate benchmark in the context of the reference I made: her limited intelligence. They are both of limited intelligence, but Truss actually believes otherwise. Maybe you think she doesn’t, and recognises she’s a bit stupid.

It’s absolutely relevant when they pontificate about others who haven’t been as fortunate as them. I’ve had an extremely fortunate upbringing and I’m always conscious how lucky that makes me and how it’s given me an advantage over others in life, and I always try to be conscious of it. Sunak manifestly does not and that speaks to his character. So completely relevant.

Not quite sure how you can be less relevant than being of no relevance; can you be negatively relevant? His relevance to the causes of what happened with RBS didn’t stop the **** making this country poorer. I couldn’t do a job like that, whatever they paid me. Fucking parasites. The fact he did, makes him a **** in my eyes.

A rat faced one.
 
I initially picked reform for a joke but have changed it to libdems (tactical vote, no point of voting labour here).

Unless others had a similar idea we obviously have some overt racists.
Just playing devils advocate for a minute, its an interesting idea that everyone who votes reform is a racist. I don't believe for one minute that 15% of the population are racist, do you believe that? There's surely more to it as to why people are choosing reform.
 
Just playing devils advocate for a minute, its an interesting idea that everyone who votes reform is a racist. I don't believe for one minute that 15% of the population are racist, do you believe that? There's surely more to it as to why people are choosing reform.

Yes. I believe at least 15% of the population are racist. It's probably closer to a 3rd.

If they aren't voting reform for their racist policies, they are fools. Many of them are racist fools.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top