Reform 2025 Limited new name same business

[bluenova]

How strange, therefore, you should choose Bob Hope as your BM moniker given that was a raving right wing Republican throughout his life.
; )

He was funny though.

 

[Big Joe Corrigan]

How strange, therefore, you should choose Bob Hope as your BM moniker given that was a raving right wing Republican throughout his life.
; )

He’s actually the owner of the B and B in Emmerdale village.

 

[Postman Pep]

Both points in your question are false.

Starmer is not responsible for bringing people in to the party. Anyone is free to join and free to express a view. Only when things cross a line is there a decision to be made and Starmer tries to keep out of that unlike his predecessor.

And Starmer has never said that starving kids is acceptable.

If you can't keep the discussion based on reality there's no point going on.

Based on reality you say. Incredible.

 

[BridgyDids]

Based on reality you say. Incredible.

Out of curiosity, who do you want as Prime Minister then?

 

[Kippaxpete]

He was funny though.

Well, that's subjective of course.

 

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

Tbf I think Hilts has got food and water mixed up, Starmer did 100% state Israel has the Right to withhold Water from the Palestinian people. Either way like me and others have said it's an abhorrent and horrific thing to say. He shouldn't be anywhere near Number 10 on that quote alone.

Nope he did not 100% state that. A journalist asked him if they had the right to do that. There is far more context here and this is the kind of BS that only feeds BS narrative.

If Starmer is not your man that's fine but don't spread BS.

 

[bluenova]

Well, that's subjective of course.

Well, all comedy is subjective. And obviously I'm not a fan of his jingoistic or sexist jokes, particularly in his later years, when he was clearly a man out of his time.

However, in terms of the development of comedy, he was an important figure. He was a great physical comedian, but at his peak, his comedy was modern, and even groundbreaking.

 

[BayernMan]

 

[bluethrunthru]

Less a patriot more Putins puppet

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Less a patriot more Putins puppet

Catnip for cunts. Surprised you still fall for it.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Well, that should be the end of his political career. Every single question to him in this election now should be about this.

 

[Fred_Quimby]

Makes a change from it being City’s fault.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Well, that should be the end of his political career. Every single question to him in this election now should be about this.

You only have to look at the expansion of Russia since the 1990s Vs EU expansion to see how wrong he is

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

You only have to look at the expansion of Russia since the 1990s Vs EU expansion to see how wrong he is

Indeed. Perhaps Mr Putin should think about why nobody is asking to become a member of Russia.

 

[Blue and true]

What a total fucking ****. I hope someone hurts him badly.

Quick edit: anyone who votes for this lot should be shipped off to a desolute place and left to rot.

 

[mosssideblue]

What a total fucking ****. I hope someone hurts him badly.

Quick edit: anyone who votes for this lot should be shipped off to a desolute place and left to rot.

I can't listen to him. His voice and attitude irritates the fuck out of me

 

[City Hobgoblin]

I can't listen to him. His voice and attitude irritates the fuck out of me

And look...he wears zany socks...must be a man of the people!

 

[City Hobgoblin]

Well, that should be the end of his political career. Every single question to him in this election now should be about this.

Putin helped him out with Brexit, he's just returning the favour.

 

[BobKowalski]

What a total fucking ****. I hope someone hurts him badly.

Quick edit: anyone who votes for this lot should be shipped off to a desolute place and left to rot.

I don’t approve of violence or shipping off people based on how they voted, but in this case I’ll allow it.

 

[SkyBlueFlux]

Nope he did not 100% state that. A journalist asked him if they had the right to do that. There is far more context here and this is the kind of BS that only feeds BS narrative.

If Starmer is not your man that's fine but don't spread BS.

The way that interview has been completely mythologised and twisted is infuriating to me and I don’t even like Starmer.

Starmer says about 10 times in 30 seconds “Israel has the right to defend itself… Israel has that right… Israel has that right…” clearly he is talking about Israel’s right to defend itself. That point is abundantly clear.

Ferrari interrupts and talks about stopping water and Starmer continues “Israel has that right [stuck in a loop of repeating the same thing he’s already said repeatedly]. Obviously everything should be done within international law.”

How has the bit in bold been totally erased from history? How has this turned into Starmer advocating the deaths of children? Is starving children within the bounds of international law? No? Then that is quite obviously not what he’s suggesting. Is stopping water as a form of collective punishment within the bounds of international law? No? Then he clearly he was not suggesting that either. It’s not a matter for ambiguity.

There have been people complaining for years about the Tories taking things out of context and weaponising them against the likes of Corbyn, and now they’re quite happily doing it themselves without a second thought. Suggesting somebody believes war crimes are okay when they have actually quite clearly said the exact opposite. Unless somebody can come here and explain how war crimes can be committed within international law.