manimanc
Well-Known Member
No doubt he'll be revealed as supporting the rags all his life.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United Thread | 2024/25
- Thread starter waspish
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Heading to new levels..... trying to swop City rejects.
Think they'll do the twenty-fifth version of the Welcome to Manchester poster, just to show they still don't have a fucking clue what the message was if they pull the swop off?
Think they'll do the twenty-fifth version of the Welcome to Manchester poster, just to show they still don't have a fucking clue what the message was if they pull the swop off?
Bluekiwi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 4,129
- Location
- New Zealand (since 1974)
- Team supported
- Manchester City (from 1955) & Adelaide Crows (AFL)
Who was the lazy 11th player who couldn't be bothered to track back and help his over-whelmed defence?There are 10 rags inside their own penalty area and yet none are anywhere near the 2 players presenting the danger. I think your comparison to Hough End is correct.
How can 10 professional footballers all be stood next to each other, it beggars belief.
But gives me hours of laughter.
Gingers Dad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 7,999
Garnacho. He was still posing for selfies with the utd fans after his disallowed goal.Who was the lazy 11th player who couldn't be bothered to track back and help his over-whelmed defence?
journolud
Well-Known Member
The Mail trumping Ugarte as the rags Rodri. Well, the headline asks the question could he be? I’ve not read the article to see if the answer is no
Gingers Dad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 7,999
If the guy was fit to lace Rodri's boots, they'd be paying at least double the ridiculous fee they've shelled out.The Mail trumping Ugarte as the rags Rodri. Well, the headline asks the question could he be? I’ve not read the article to see if the answer is no
manimanc
Well-Known Member
He's been at PSG for a year, only played 21 times last season and now they're getting rid.The Mail trumping Ugarte as the rags Rodri. Well, the headline asks the question could he be? I’ve not read the article to see if the answer is no
The Mail talking tripe yet again, oh the shock.
like i said in the other thread, if he had a quarter of rodris capabilities then do we really think LUIS ENRIQUE would be getting rid of him.He's been at PSG for a year, only played 21 times last season and now they're getting rid.
The Mail talking tripe yet again, oh the shock.
I'm really struggling to see how a Sterling/Sancho makes sense for anyone involved (and therefore I'm all for it).
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
Tbf they are talking about Rhodri, the welsh midfielder who plays for Bangor.The Mail trumping Ugarte as the rags Rodri. Well, the headline asks the question could he be? I’ve not read the article to see if the answer is no
Last edited:
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
It is a very odd one. Out of the two, Sterling probably has the best chance at making it a positive move. It’s certainly one I doubt anyone saw coming, should it go through.I'm really struggling to see how a Sterling/Sancho makes sense for anyone involved (and therefore I'm all for it).
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
What it does show though is we know exactly what we are doing.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
I'm really struggling to see how a Sterling/Sancho makes sense for anyone involved (and therefore I'm all for it).
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
Another scattergun bit of business for the rags, yes it gets Sancho gone but what are they getting? Sterling’s best years were a long time ago inside a Guardiola system, he’s failed to get anywhere near that at Chelsea and won’t get any better at the age he is now. He might get some joy going into space when they are sat in two banks of five in big games that’s about it.
It is a very odd one. Out of the two, Sterling probably has the best chance at making it a positive move. It’s certainly one I doubt anyone saw coming, should it go through.
What it does show though is we know exactly what we are doing.
Totally agree. United will be swapping a square peg on big wages (but only 2 years left on their contract) for another square peg on big wages but lumbered with them for another 3-5 years at 30 years old and with their best years undoubtedly behind them.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Ex Liverpool and city player playing for the rags?
The mardarses in the stands would self combust with bitterness.
Piss funny two of our rejects are giving the red pricks sleepless nights.
The mardarses in the stands would self combust with bitterness.
Piss funny two of our rejects are giving the red pricks sleepless nights.
Vienna_70
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 45,037
- Location
- 100, 32, 106, +79, 19
- Team supported
- Treble Winners 2022/23.
There’s probably only the Yorkshire clogger, who can beat that: City, dirty Leeds and Littlewoods.Ex Liverpool and city player playing for the rags?
The mardarses in the stands would self combust with bitterness.
Piss funny two of our rejects are giving the red pricks sleepless nights.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
Hes the one ro suit kick n rush kids footballIt is a very odd one. Out of the two, Sterling probably has the best chance at making it a positive move. It’s certainly one I doubt anyone saw coming, should it go through.
What it does show though is we know exactly what we are doing.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,601
Why would either player be willing to lower their wages?Sancho Sterling deal is just a convenient move that would reduce the wage bill for both teams!
Because they're shit?Why would either player be willing to lower their wages?
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,601
Exactly why they’ll want their money. No one will be offering it them again.Because they're shit?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.