As I thought.
Just find it interesting the lack of criticism for Trump by you on an issue you seem quite passionate about.Your original question, before you changed it, was because we know Republicans are generally cunts about war and death.
Trump, originally, started out as a Democratic, so his stance is different, somewhat.
So, your changed response above, makes no sense.
Just find it interesting the lack of criticism for Trump by you on an issue you seem quite passionate about.
Ar least we know that you're not prepared to criticise cunts. It helps me understand where you're coming from in this debate.I didn't critique the Tories much either. Why? Cos they're cunts and know it.
It's disappointing that the cunts that are doing damage in power represent my closer values than those cnt out of power making both sets cunts of equal order in the end.
Ar least we know that you're not prepared to criticise cunts. It helps me understand where you're coming from in this debate.
And I won't question your lack of criticism of Trump again.
The art film Nailin' Palin confirmed that according to my mate.David Letterman once said Palin looked like a "slutty air hostess".
Sorry, bit too difficult to comprehend that.Criticising cunts you know are cunts as they have been since you've known them, makes no difference, but shouting down a void.
Criticising who you thought was a 'friend' who, in fact, does cunty fucking things makes you criticise them in hope they do better.
It's not hard to understand.
Criticising cunts you know are cunts as they have been since you've known them, makes no difference, but shouting down a void.
Criticising who you thought was a 'friend' who, in fact, does cunty fucking things makes you criticise them in hope they do better.
It's not hard to understand.
Sorry, bit too difficult to comprehend that.
As @mexico1970, correctly, reminds me.
I can critique both the Dems and Reps and I do.
33
You critique the Reps, so where your own of the Dems?
It's like asking a neutral how come they criticise the rags for being shit at football but don't criticise City.
It's all about words, actions and behaviour for me, so while Trump, Vance and their supporters continue to be racist, sexist and otherwise offensive on a daily basis I'll be more critical of them than the other side.
When they stick to their message, when they focus on issues rather than personalities then I won't be as critical.
And you can rest assured that if and when Harris and Walz start with the racism, sexism then I'll be equally as critical of them. Although I believe there is a "I expected to be cunts so I dont need to criticise" exemption available.
PS. Trump is the rags, and Harris is City in case I didn't make it clear.
Like I said, I have no allegiance to any party.Hilarious reply! I, actually, can't be arsed going down the rabbit hole that the Dems have created cos I'd be here for quite a while!
If you think Harris has no faults with the way she targeted Black men and families, you haven't researched enough. Let's put it this way, the RFK released online vid about her has no lies.
And don't tarnish City with a zionist like Harris, thanks.
Like I said, I have no allegiance to any party.
I'll respond to actions, words and behaviour. And am happy to discuss the words, actions and campaigns if any of the candidates.
Not aware of how Harris has "targeted black men and families", I'm sure you'll full us all in the the details.
Unlike you, if I feel the candidate I how wins deserves criticism, I'll criticise.
I'll pass on RFK videos though, I think the worm makes more sense.
You can tell me all about the above if you want. Happy to discuss.You're 'passing' on a lot. You don't want to know about her flip-flopping on positions, you don't want to know about some of her more curious prosecutor decisions and you don't want to know about the ad put out that wasn't lies.
LOL!
Okay, I get the point that she can do no wrong, but I have to criticise Trump, though!
Haha!
Well, we all expect the poster in question to act like a **** and so we stopped criticizing him and ignore him now, so I see where he got the idea.You can tell me all about the above if you want. Happy to discuss.
For balance we can also talk about flipflopping from Trump on abortion in recent days, Vance flip flopping on whether Trump was like Hitler or not and the lies coming out of the Trump campaign (election in November, we might not have enough time for that).
Happy to discuss them all, but let's discuss them all, not just focus on one side you don't like and ignore the other because we expect Trump to act like a **** so we shouldn't criticise him.
What, Trump can’t be criticised because he’s a ****?You can tell me all about the above if you want. Happy to discuss.
For balance we can also talk about flipflopping from Trump on abortion in recent days, Vance flip flopping on whether Trump was like Hitler or not and the lies coming out of the Trump campaign (election in November, we might not have enough time for that).
Happy to discuss them all, but let's discuss them all, not just focus on one side you don't like and ignore the other because we expect Trump to act like a **** so we shouldn't criticise him.
No, it’s pointless to criticize him BECAUSE he’s a ****. Apparently Pol Pot, the Tories, General Pinochet and the 1975 Philadelphia Flyers were all cunts, so no need to criticize them either I guess.What, Trump can’t be criticised because he’s a ****?
Scary shit when you think about it. Murdering dictators, cannot criticise. Crazy despots, can’t criticise. Trump, absolute ****, get fucked that we cannot critique and criticise.
I’ve no truck in this whatsoever. I find the whole process of election, the election canvassing and the two party choice of governance hilarious tbh.You're 'passing' on a lot. You don't want to know about her flip-flopping on positions, you don't want to know about some of her more curious prosecutor decisions and you don't want to know about the ad put out that wasn't lies.
LOL!
Okay, I get the point that she can do no wrong, but I have to criticise Trump, though!
Haha!
Just forget it, they’re beyond reproach.No, it’s pointless to criticize him BECAUSE he’s a ****. Apparently Pol Pot, the Tories, General Pinochet and the 1975 Philadelphia Flyers were all cunts, so no need to criticize them either I guess.