dadnlad
Well-Known Member
Because there just after headlinesJust watched Stefan on Talkshite on you tube. Is it me or is he becoming more negative with regards to the potential outcome of City's case?
Because there just after headlinesJust watched Stefan on Talkshite on you tube. Is it me or is he becoming more negative with regards to the potential outcome of City's case?
I am sure they will amend the rules if it was us doing it especially as Chelsea basically sold the hotels to themselvesHow much of our hotel needs to be built before we can sell it to the CFG?
I’ll have it if it makes it easier. I might need to borrow £100m though.I am sure they will amend the rules if it was us doing it especially as Chelsea basically sold the hotels to themselves
I think so. This is S.32 of The Limitation Act 1990. I don't have a legal background, but I did get involved in lots of limitation cases when I worked for United Utilities.Are you sure mate?
I understood that in CRIMINAL cases as you state there is a bar.
But In CIVIL cases it's six years?
It'd need a FMV test though, as I'm pretty sure the APT rules would have you down as 'associated'I’ll have it if it makes it easier. I might need to borrow £100m though.
Are you sure mate?
I understood that in CRIMINAL cases as you state there is a bar.
But In CIVIL cases it's six years?
Niall Quinn, tarnished my arse.
True. Not sure how much a hotel in Beswick would go for…It'd need a FMV test though, as I'm pretty sure the APT rules would have you down as 'associated'
What's Annabel Tiffin got to do with this?Imagine mozart banging symphony in A minor in front of an owl in a jar .
Same same situation here
Making it up as they go along.
Premier league, fucking bent
Then BlueCo 22 sell it back to Chelsea Holdings next season...who then sell it back to Blu...
Did he?Niall Quinn, tarnished my arse.
Theyll knock them down to revamp stadiumThen BlueCo 22 sell it back to Chelsea Holdings next season...who then sell it back to Blu...
We don’t own any of the coop. CFG do.There is no rule stopping it.
We can't have the co op revenue towards PSR but it will be on our accounts! Now that there is bias agenda rule! Why can't our % asset of the co op be used towards PSR? When an asset of Chelsea the hotels is allowed? Maybe if we had an owner who was American they'd of said yep!
This is the thing. What the hotels worth ? Could argue very high London property market but then again. I bet they don’t make that much money. In fact I am sure I read that somewhere. Who would stay at a Chelsea hotel if not for the football ? And why would rivals put money in them ? Plus there will be a management company taking the profit. And like you say they will either get knocked down if Stamford Bridge is developed or of Chelsea move do they become more appealing to the general public none football fans rivals or less no reason to stay there now ? As Liverpool said what was the loosing bid ? Guessing this is too late for our case ? Wonder if clubs are questioning this ?Theyll knock them down to revamp stadium
Shindlers next book?Niall Quinn, tarnished my arse.