Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gone for a Burton said:
100%.

Without the attempt to destroy us, we'd be the most popular club in the country and many EFL clubs second favourite team.

Aside from reputational & image damage, the red yank cartels onslaught over 10 years has cost us £millions£ in commercial losses.

I hope,with every bone in my body, that we exact the most devastating revenge and recompense.

"Once and for all" !!
Click to expand...
**** Furththermore, we've incurred huge legal and staff costs in defending ourselves which wouldn't otherwise have been incurred !!

A total of circa £100million isn't unreasonable.
 
Blueboy73 said:
First green shoot of recovery courtesy of Red Howard today getting the rats red card overturned.
Click to expand...
Saw this in the paper this morning. What I don't get is how is there the need for an appeals system given we have VAR these days? Surely there's no point of appeal given all straight reds are reviewed by VAR? The fact it's been successfully overturned means that both the ref and VAR got it wrong.
FWIW, I thought it was a soft red but Rat Face is a twat, so I couldn't care less.
 
Stockton Heath Blue said:
Saw this in the paper this morning. What I don't get is how is there the need for an appeals system given we have VAR these days? Surely there's no point of appeal given all straight reds are reviewed by VAR? The fact it's been successfully overturned means that both the ref and VAR got it wrong.
FWIW, I thought it was a soft red but Rat Face is a twat, so I couldn't care less.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't have been overturned had the rags won or there hadn't had been the outcry of such injustice from the media outlets. Let's get it right it was only the week before they was trying to get haaland a 3 game ban for throwing the ball at that tarquin ****. Trossad being harshly treated compared to doku. And the week before how rice shouldn't have been sent off. The media are trying to ref the games themselves and use outside influence on the PL
 
This being over turned is a total nonsense, you can see he slipped, and that the ball has gone, and that he raises his studs after the slip, it is not accidental and high, whatever the contact it does not matter, it is a straight red. Webb should be questioned under which law he rescinded the red.
 
The minute the ugly twat did that post match interview you knew it was going to get overturned. Since when do sky sports or any other media interview someone sent off? Never.
It's so see through the way these red mardarses get preferential treatment to everyone else but like it or not it'll continue, even though they are shite and an absolute mess on and off the field they will get smoke blown up their arse by all the media, it's almost like it is written into their contracts.
 
manimanc said:
The minute the ugly twat did that post match interview you knew it was going to get overturned. Since when do sky sports or any other media interview someone sent off? Never.
It's so see through the way these red mardarses get preferential treatment to everyone else but like it or not it'll continue, even though they are shite and an absolute mess on and off the field they will get smoke blown up their arse by all the media, it's almost like it is written into their contracts.
Click to expand...
If it was indeed a yellow - then him appearing in front of salivating Sky should in effect be a second yellow. - You get a sent off and you're out of the match completely - including the cameras. Only those arrogant fucks would put him out there.
We know the financial rules are different for those cunts, now the disciplinary ones are too (yeah, I know, have been for years).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top