supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 15,791
West Ham fans support us
View attachment 134250
Got so much time for this. I know a few Hammers and they're always very supportive of us.
West Ham fans support us
View attachment 134250
Lol!I look forward to seeing Newcastle announce a £1bn sponsorship deal from a Saudi Chainsaw manufacturer and a Riyadh-based stone supplier.
What ever he feels about us, times it by a billion and you'd still be short of the utter fucking hatred I have for that shower of total and utter CUNTS!All the Twitter bots have been activated by the usual suspects I see.
Rag **** on Talkshite couldn't contain his hatred.
"Make you think City will escape the 225 charges"
Rag ****.
but he didn't know what we all know now in that the PL denied City two sponsors for no good reason at all and also the PL letting clubs off with shareholder loans. He was just coming from the angle that discrimination is very hard to prove but given the PL's racist agenda it was actually quite easy by the looks of it.He chose to quote tariq panja while also saying on talksport that he thought we wouldnt win, clearly an intelligent and well informed man but the sources you use and the company you keep goes along way.
I fancy Dan Roan had some input. Anyone seen this model of fairness and propriety standing on Ashton New Road, microphone in hand, belabouring the PL for their unlawful rule book?
CorrectedDon't hold your breath. Masters has about as much shame as a politician.
City challenged the “amendments” not APT as a whole..Haven't read the whole thing, but it seems like we won on all the issues (haven't seen one we lost on yet?) - we lost some of the arguments we made in relation to those issues, but I don't think City argued that they didn't want any rules (it doesn't benefit them at this point) - just that the rules as implemented were illegal.
I think what happened was something like (making these numbers up) we made 10 arguments as to why on each point, and lost on 5 of them, but we only needed 1. Something like that. The overall conclusion seems to be, and I apologize for the legal speak, get fucked Premier League.
Yep. They also recruited good managers in Mourinho OGS Ten Haag Moyes and van gaal. Meanwhile in other news the Easter bunny is alive and well and having dinner with Santa and the tooth fairiesDon’t worry, the consensus on Rag Cafe is that we lost.
You don’t have to be thick to be a rag but…..
West Ham fans on our side and against their owners on this.The PL amateurs get their comeuppance, the red cartel know the writing’s on the wall and the shitty little clubs who endorsed the tyranny of the majority deserve their never ending lives grubbing around in the shadows
Fuck Brentford
Fuck Bournemouth
Fuck Fulham
Fuck Wolves
Fuck West Ham
Good luck to Chelsea Newcastle and Everton
It's shocking how this is being reported. The findings are quite clear. The premier league's rules are unlawful, and their decisions were reached in a procedurally unfair manner.
The PL and Press can paint this however they like, it is clearly a resounding victory for MCFC!
To be fair to them, West Ham fans know with the right investment they could have a decade like we have had (and who can begrudge them), and business as usual is designed to lock them out forever.Got so much time for this. I know a few Hammers and they're always very supportive of us.
Please tell me the rags have a MASSIVE amount of shareholder loans
With his wages sponsored by Emirates Palace.Wait til Pep signs a 5 year extension.
You absolutely would think so wouldn’t you. That’s exactly what this suggests is happening though. Arsenal to the extent of 200+ million have had interest free owner investment. No idea what impact that’s had on their PSR, but it stinks and just shows how manipulative the rules they have cooked up are."owner interest free loans"
Isn't that THE VERY definition of financial doping?