PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Colin Bells Boots said:
Even if it critically adversely affects their finances ?

Turkeys voting for Cristmas ?
Click to expand...
It does seem self sabotage is the order of the day.

The league and the finance rules (ffp/Psr)that mainly benefit a few while targeting others inadvertently left the whole structure a roaring success for infighting and instability.

Clubs still have too much debt. The red teams still can’t win and City get dragged to tribunals again and again and again.

Someone needs to have the balls to do away with it and reset the whole thing.

Stop scaremongering clubs with the Middle East bogeyman. If your club is run well and you have a coach who improves his players then winning will happen naturally.

Race to the bottom right about now.
 
mancboy said:
The PL has lost it entirely, it is now questioning the integrity and veracity of its OWN independent panel.
Click to expand...
This is just insanity by Masters. They also put out a press release at the time slagging off the panel’s decision. The PL is supposed to be impartial and treat its clubs equally. They can’t slag off their own process. The organisation is out of control. How stupid are other club directors to tolerate this situation.
 
M18CTID said:
Who knows whether that Athletic article is based in truth? Could be bollocks but the snippets relating to player contracts may indicate that City have fed them a few titbits including the timeline regarding the case ;)
Click to expand...
That Pol Ballus geezer is credited to part of the story in The Athletic, so it’s feasible I suppose that he’s who has been fed a couple of lines?
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
This is just insanity by Masters. They also put out a press release at the time slagging off the panel’s decision. The PL is supposed to be impartial and treat its clubs equally. They can’t slag off their own process. The organisation is out of control. How stupid are other club directors to tolerate this situation.
Click to expand...

They’ve had Nottingham Forest as the only case out of four so far where they haven’t had any push backs legally on their stand point. It’s lunacy that it’s turning into the Wild West on its governance and clubs probably don’t have any clue if the rule book they have to abide by is actually legal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top