The Stones Goal

[SebastianBlue]

City are officially one of the PL BIG BOYS.

Is it possible that PL referees, on occasion, subconsciously favour the laws of the game?

 

[Inter Me Nan]

City are officially one of the PL BIG BOYS.

Didn't say owt about who got their winner last season though, strange that!

 

[Blueboy73]

Terrible, terrible decision”

Bournemouth fans were sick of O'Neil's whinging and blaming the officials every time they lost before he was sacked.
How long until Wolves suss out that the common denominator isn't the match officials?

 

[roubaixtuesday]

So did I, partly because I was going mental, I had Aguero v Spurs in the Champions League flashbacks.

Hadn't realised the linesman had stuck his flag up.

That was Sterling as I remember it? Place went mental, guy behind me fell into my seat.

Have loathed VAR ever since.

 

[blue for life]

The Barnsley Beckenbauer is a legend!

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

Heavy goals.

Is Big Balls Stonesey the new....Dzeko?

 

[Pam]

There’s no debate, the goal was 100% legit ..

Why was it even in question??????

 

[toffee balls]

What a load of fucking shite

Premier League release statement after Man City awarded controversial goal

Manchester City earned a stoppage time victory over Wolverhampton Wanderers thanks to John Stones' last gasp header that required VAR to intervene before being awarded for Pep Guardiola's side

www.mirror.co.uk

Quoting The Mirror, lower than a snake’s belly.

 

[TFC]

City are officially one of the PL BIG BOYS.

We've made it!

 

[Blue Til Death]

Why was it even in question??????

Because City scored it..

 

[Beaker]

The only thing that should be being discussed is what a brilliant header it was.

 

[its a Barm]

It's bloody obvious it was a goal don't understand why there is an ongoing debate within the media.

 

[Withnail]

The game has gone, if that goal was not allowed to stand.

 

[aka blue jambo]

It's bloody obvious it was a goal don't understand why there is an ongoing debate within the media.

I think we do know why there is a fabricated debate about it.
Chelsea should be more aggrieved

 

[SWPISHOME]

Commentators were clueless

Don Goodman days hi

 

[Blue_eyes]

FS, was it a foul on the keeper as the corner came in............no,

was Bernie intefering or obstructing keepers view as Stones headed it...............also no,

There are no other ways to disallow the fcking goal.

Sky and them whipping up a hate City storm cos we won and they had prepped the studio for us dropping points lol.

They literally twisted everything to make us look bad, including the way var/ref worked and the offside issue.

Fck them and fck anyone who refuses to see it as it is.

I have already had to argue with someone over it, so well done sky for weaponising oppo fans(again).

 

[Bald fraud]

You know how bad things are when Richard’s and Sturridge.Two former city players. Are more gutted about the goal being awarded than dalgliesh’s daughter and Carragher!

 

[I'm Blue]

Is it offside?
No, he’s not interfering with play.
Is it a foul on the keeper?
No, see arsenals goal against us.
Is it controversial cos it was scored by state owned oil cheaty City?
One million percent yes.

 

[A57 the snake]

Just got in from work and watched it several times , honestly listening to the radio etc…I expected something really controversial.
I have no clue absolutely what the commotion is about.
Johnny stones a great last minute header that’s all we have.

 

[birchvillablue]

Seems like every goal we score is scrutinised and sent to VAR, love seeing the tears and bitterness from the media, stonking header from Stones.