PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Gremlin]

Why? Why must it have any significance. Can it not be simply a claim to the size of the impact of the verdict. It is right, as well.

Anything else beyond that is whatever people want it to be.

Tolmie could post 'eggs have yolks' on twitter and quite a few people here would look for it to mean we have won and the cartel are crumbling.

Given the cryptic nature of many of his posts, I have always pictured Tolmie like this:

 

[Kippaxpete]

Given the cryptic nature of many of his posts, I have always pictured Tolmie like this:
View attachment 138930

Which one?

 

[Big mals fedora]

Why? Why must it have any significance. Can it not be simply a claim to the size of the impact of the verdict. It is right, as well.

Anything else beyond that is whatever people want it to be.

Tolmie could post 'eggs have yolks' on twitter and quite a few people here would look for it to mean we have won and the cartel are crumbling.

Surely if Tolm posted about eggs, the punchline would be about the ‘cartel cracking’, not crumbling

 

[cityontheup]

He was involved at CAS as well. Perfectly normal.

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th

 

[Blue_Lightsaber]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th

Does the 5th even exist in the UK's constitution/ law?

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th

The 5th in a row? ;)

 

[cityontheup]

Does the 5th even exist in the UK's constitution/ law?

Just a turn of phrase mate, here it would probably be our legal team telling him to stay away

 

[citizen_maine]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide we wouldn't have put him on our list of witnesses

 

[cityontheup]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide we wouldn't have put him on our list of witnesses

Exactly

 

[KS55]

My thoughts.
It don't sound to good when the gaffer has to get involved

At CAS he testified by sworn letter that he had never paid for a sponsorship or ordered anyone to do so. My bet is this was his testimony again. Maybe in person.

 

[manimanc]

My thoughts.
It don't sound to good when the gaffer has to get involved

It sounds exceedingly good if the big man is brought in.
I'd love to know how they approach him or ask the awkward questions.

 

[Xhavenjoe]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th

The only interesting me is the 5th premier league title in a row

 

[dadnlad]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide we wouldn't have put him on our list of witnesses

Can just hear him now

What the f××k are you lot on about .

 

[paul power]

I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th

This is The ultimate evidence that we have nothing to hide and is innocent. If we were guilty on some of The more servere charges there is no way he would testify. A cross examination of The owner, would be out of The question if we had any concern about The outcome.

 

[Keeper!]

Thank you. I have been told in recent days even the owner has gone in to bat!

115 not out and forced the follow on?

 

[Pingu the Penguin]

This is The ultimate evidence that we have nothing to hide and is innocent. If we were guilty on some of The more servere charges there is no way he would testify. A cross examination of The owner, would be out of The question if we had any concern about The outcome.

Nah just some dirty forrin type. All the same. Corrupt. Etc ((c) Liverpool echo)

 

[calumdown]

Can just hear him now

What the f××k are you lot on about .

not sure they have a direct translation for fuck

ما الذي تتحدث عنه بحق الجحيم؟

 

[Keith Moon]

At CAS he testified by sworn letter that he had never paid for a sponsorship or ordered anyone to do so. My bet is this was his testimony again. Maybe in person.

Not a chance that he rocked up in court. Below his pay grade.

 

[KS55]

Not a chance that he rocked up in court. Below his pay grade.

But if the tribunal would not accept written evidence….or the PL insisted on a right to question him.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

But if the tribunal would not accept written evidence….or the PL insisted on a right to question him.

Video evidence?