Does that really say the standard of proof in a civil case involving fraud is more aligned to the criminal standard, or is it just saying the standard is balance of probabilities but in view of the serious of the charges the cogency of the evidence required elevates the standard?
Which is what we have been saying in our case?
In the circumstances of the case quoted, this meant a standard not far short of the criminal standard. In our case, it may be less than that, or, much less likely, more?
I have read the text book again, just now and it says that establishing fraud is higher than for other types of civil action but not as high relating to criminal matters, but close to the criminal standard. :-)The threshold is not higher and not aligned with criminal law. It is BoP but the evidence must be cogent in essence to overcome the inherently improbability that professionals would commit such discreditable acts. While dishonesty is inherently more improbable than an innocent explanation, cogent and compelling evidence of dishonesty can and will shift this balance. But it is certainly not a criminal standard so make sure you re read that text book.
All I’m trying to say is the threshold for proving fraud in a civil court is higher than other types of civil action.
Oooooooooooooooooooooooo Matron !!Don't know which I would prefer: having my tackle tickled or my tattle tittled :)
I had a rag mate mention the same yesterday. I told him the players mustn’t have known about it in the first half against Brighton and Sporting, or for 80 minutes against Feyenord, nor against Forest.Talkshite reckon the players know something and this is the reason why they’ve given up! Can someone point out that nobody knows fuck all because if they did it would be all over the press unless of course we are in course to win.
if the players know that means the backroom staff knowI had a rag mate mention the same yesterday. I told him the players mustn’t have known about it in the first half against Brighton and Sporting, or for 80 minutes against Feyenord, nor against Forest.
If the players knew then their agents would know, and the agents would leak like a sieve.Talkshite reckon the players know something and this is the reason why they’ve given up! Can someone point out that nobody knows fuck all because if they did it would be all over the press unless of course we are in course to win.
Talkshite trawl this place for info ,the mood of us blues and the questions being asked like should we sack pep etc , that is why we should be careful what we writeTalkshite reckon the players know something and this is the reason why they’ve given up! Can someone point out that nobody knows fuck all because if they did it would be all over the press unless of course we are in course to win.
Brown nosing ****.I know how you feel Ste, it all gets on top at some point. All the best mate, have a good one.
Yes the players do indeed know the outcome. It’s explains why they have turned to crap.Talkshite reckon the players know something and this is the reason why they’ve given up! Can someone point out that nobody knows fuck all because if they did it would be all over the press unless of course we are in course to win.
Pinto is already a convicted criminal. The prosecution case was proven in his first trial. The court rejected his claims to be a whistleblower and the evidence was overwhelming. He demanded money from Doyen Sports agency not to relase information he had hacked. The next trial involves more extortion charges. None of these cases relate to City. He has not a cat in hell's chance of convincing any court he is a whistleblower. He had money in Swiss bank accounts he had taken from other organisations. There is no evidence he has more material from City other than that already publshed by Der Spiegl.He was indicted in July 2023 on 377 new charges, primarily related to unauthorized access to emails from S.L. Benfica and information connected to Cristiano Ronaldo's rape case. The upcoming trial could further complicate his legal situation, following his earlier suspended sentence of four years. Rui Pinto's "get out of jail card" is if the court chooses to view him as a whistleblower rather than a criminal, which will be more difficult this time. It is highly likely that he has shared everything he has on Manchester City with the Premier League.
Yes, they know we will be cleared and both sets of red shite will get points deductions for chatting shit - titles in the bag.Talkshite reckon the players know something and this is the reason why they’ve given up! Can someone point out that nobody knows fuck all because if they did it would be all over the press unless of course we are in course to win.
Misplaced pass?Explain the Foden goal then.
Inviting an allegation that I'm arrogant again, but the textbook is wrong if it does say that. Really is as simple as that. If you show me exactly what it says I can explain but there is only one standard of proof in civil cases: the balance of probabilities.I have read the text book again, just now and it says that establishing fraud is higher than for other types of civil action but not as high relating to criminal matters, but close to the criminal standard. :-)
Behave. Talkshite slag us off when we were winning.Talkshite trawl this place for info ,the mood of us blues and the questions being asked like should we sack pep etc , that is why we should be careful what we write
people want to see goals not possession based football, goals cause excitement passing doesntAre people really talking about ‘Our boring football’ from last season, the season in which we made unprecedented history with 4 PL titles in a row?
After a gruelling 4 years, winning everything on the planet with some amazing football, I’m amazed we even got ourselves into that position, never mind winning the fucking thing!
How quickly people forget.