mancity111
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 1,417
Look it up and again you clearly cannot prosecute an argument effectively hence you resort to words like pathetic and not deserving a response other than actually responding by saying as much , now that is bordering on meaningless and a waste of your time which you seem to enjoy doing for some reason.Bullshit.
Get your facts right.
The rest of that post is so pathetic it doesn't deserve a response
Lets summarize , climate change is real , the climate , like the weather is constantly changing , how to best respond to it needs proper analysis and debate including posing the argument that coal and gas is the quickest way to bring developing nations out of poverty if the developed world in conjunction with the developing has the will to do so.
Personally I like nuclear , because its clean , green , eventually cheaper and much more reliable than renewables but we shall always have a need for Carbo Hydrons and for good reason that go beyond the narrow climate change discussion.
You cannot begin to prosecute a case for one path or another without looking at the economics , politics , social and scientific aspects of what can be achieved and how its likely to change the world for the better or not as the case may be.