If there is an willingness on both sides to settle I would say the best way is to involve both sides in negotiation.But they did invade and they are currently fighting a bloody war. The question is how do we stop it, not how do we not start it.
If there is an willingness on both sides to settle I would say the best way is to involve both sides in negotiation.But they did invade and they are currently fighting a bloody war. The question is how do we stop it, not how do we not start it.
Well the best way would be for Russia to fuck off home and pay for the rebuilding of the Ukraine towns and villages it has completely destroyed. Now if mango shitgibbon starts his negotiation at that point, I'd consider changing my opinion of the fat war mongering ****
If there is an willingness on both sides to settle I would say the best way is to involve both sides in negotiation.
No. My worry is Trump/American involvement in so called conflict resolution in one area of the world compared to another.Im not sure why you said this. I don't think i claimed otherwise.
Im not sure i understand the point of these questions... Are you saying i should care more about Gaza than Cameroun or Nigeria because American government is more involved there?
Like below?If there is an willingness on both sides to settle I would say the best way is to involve both sides in negotiation.
Utter fantasy. This will all end up at the negotiating table with Russia and the west thrashing out a settlement they can live with and protects their interests. The idea that any western leaders actually care about Ukraine is for the birds.Well the best way would be for Russia to fuck off home and pay for the rebuilding of the Ukraine towns and villages it has completely destroyed. Now if mango shitgibbon starts his negotiation at that point, I'd consider changing my opinion of the fat war mongering ****
You are an embarrassing ****.So are you not pleased he is begining the process? I am.
I am not as keen as you to antagonise by demanding pre-invasion borders. It needs to be professionally negotiated just like the release of the hostages in Palestine.
I'm aware it's fantasy, it was posted in response to "nuke the fuckers" and basically let Russia have the win, which are (or should be) equally as fantastic.Utter fantasy. This will all end up at the negotiating table with Russia and the west thrashing out a settlement they can live with and protects their interests. The idea that any western leaders actually care about Ukraine is for the birds.
Possibly, but it would depend on the substance of the discussions.![]()
Trump holds talks with Zelensky following his 1.5-hour-long conversation with Putin
"The conversation went very well. He, like President (Vladimir) Putin, wants to make peace. We discussed a variety of topics having to do with the war, but mostly, the meeting that is being set up on Friday in Munich, where Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio will lead the...kyivindependent.com
Like as has happened.
Basically, we will give Russia what it wants and if there’s any further conflict, you’re on your own.From the beeb
Hegseth said any durable peace must include "robust security guarantees to ensure that the war will not begin again".
However, he said "the United States does not believe that Nato membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement".
Instead, security guarantees should be backed by "capable European and non-European troops".
"If these troops are deployed as peacekeepers to Ukraine at any point, they should be deployed as part of a non-Nato mission and they should not be covered under Article 5," he said, referring to the alliance's mutual defence clause.
Now I read this as America making sure that if (or when) it kicks off again, with european peacekeepers in the firing line, they are there without the protection afforded them by article 5, and hence no requirement for america to put its muscle where its mouth is currently going
You are being gaslit, you stupid ****.Fair play to him he sounds like he has finally made a breakthrough with Russia and Ukraine. No one knows what any peace deal may look like and Zelenskyy will have to agree to whatever is on the table.
How can anyone not think this good news other than base it on their hatred of Trump? Any other president or politician did this they would be being praised.
But it is a start is it not? That is all we can ask for.Possibly, but it would depend on the substance of the discussions.
What nobody wants to see is Russia helping itself to land tag lagYou're excellent at describing the problem and I don't disagree but.... how are you going to achieve what your objectives are if there are to be no negotiations? The only realistic option available is to continue and/or escalate the bloody battles which I'd like to believe nobody wants to see.
Seems like anyone who disagrees with you is a ****.... and to think I've always enjoyed your posts and probably will continue to do so.You are an embarrassing ****.
So here's a little insight into how Trump is Putinising America.
AP - the Associated Press newswire - is banned from the White House.
Why? They refused to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.
Broadcasters and press who repeat regime propaganda are rewarded. Those who don't are punished. Friendly oligarchs get to join the government.
This is exactly how it started in Putin's Russia. It ends with killing your opponents and invasion of neighbouring countries.
It's in progress in America now.
Can't disagree with that.What nobody wants to see is Russia helping itself to land tag lag
He probably would tbf.If your solicitor opened divorce negotiations with your wife by offering her the marital home plus the whole of your pension before discussing anything else, while she was slashing the tyres of your car, I doubt you'd think it was a "good thing".
Everyone?Who knows what his opening gambit would be?