PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

mancboy said:
As i have stated in the past, i thoroughly believe that if the pl were confident of landing any of the serious charges then they wouldnt have added the window dressing of the lesser none co-operation charges and nor would they have done it over multiple seasons.

3 charges doesnt play well in the press but 115 charges makes good headlines and talking points and makes it look like the pl are doing a thorough job instead of a load of window dressing, if they were confident of the main charges there would be no merit in the mud slinging lesser charges IMO
Click to expand...
That is what I thought earlier in the process. If the police had evidence that a person committed bank robbery they probably wouldn't charge him for a bald tyre on the getaway car.
 
Must be " interesting " for the City representative ( not sure who actually attends on our behalf ) going into these meetings, knowing full well that most of the others attending together with Masters and other PL lackies, will no doubt be trying to screw us up at every opportunity.
 
Colin Bells Boots said:
Must be " interesting " for the City representative ( not sure who actually attends on our behalf ) going into these meetings, knowing full well that most of the others attending together with Masters and other PL lackies, will no doubt be trying to screw us up at every opportunity.
Click to expand...
all two face bastards i get look after own interest first but you can see ill scratch your back if you vote this, most are happy taking money mid table
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top