york away to this!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 11,021
Is that from Robertson's, or Duerr's?I've heard that tomorrow is the day, 9am announcement.....
Just thought I'd get it in before someone else does ;-)
Is that from Robertson's, or Duerr's?I've heard that tomorrow is the day, 9am announcement.....
Just thought I'd get it in before someone else does ;-)
I too did this. ( didn’t have a mini snooker table though)my pitch was glued to a piece of hardboard that sat on top of my mini snooker table.
no sore knees.
My grandad was one of the fruit sourcing managers for Robertsons in the 50s-70s.Robertson's jam factory was in Droylsden.
Something that I was very proud of being a Droylsden lad, especially when I moved to London in the late 80s.
I took great delight in spreading my Robertson's jam on my morning toast, knowing where it originated from.
He's an ex-Liverpool player, it could never be his fault.My old fella was a chartered accountant and he always told he when employing subcontractors you need to do two things to prove they're not employees: 1) make sure they're doing the same type of work for someone else and 2) make sure they have the right of substitution ie they can send someone else of comparable skill/ability/clout to do the job. If you don't do this you run the risk of them being classed as employees which is fair enough.
The bottom line is, these guys all earn a fortune, they're grown men and can pay a tax advisor or accountant to tell them what their sitiatiom and liability is.
In short, it's his own stupid bloody fault if he gets done.
You obviously didn't get the sarcasm, that every day someone somewhere says it's tomorrow ;-)
He just shouted "Goal" before picking the ball up and placing it on the half way lineNo goal line technology????!!!!
It's not a criminal case so we will never be "guilty or not guilty" no matter how much the media try to spin it. The tone of the Judges' statement will be important. In the CAS case it was pretty damning about UEFA.Trouble is the no evidence language is different from a not guilty. So we are still cheats but there was no evidence. So then how are we cheats? Well there is no way we could be better than united or eant more than Liverpool unless we were cheats. Everyone knows it
Actually illustrates where their research indicates what their main listeners want to hear.Perfectly illustrates what the station thinks about our club.
Why any City fan would help fund it by listening to it is beyond me.
Legend for that alone hahaAlso the unforgettable coffee drinking,half hearted,"guard of honour " for the dippers. Priceless.
Cas was time barred and we got fined £20m. All the evidence you need right thereIt's not a criminal case so we will never be "guilty or not guilty" no matter how much the media try to spin it. The tone of the Judges' statement will be important. In the CAS case it was pretty damning about UEFA.
Seriously! My mental health has tanked the last couple years.It’s pretty horrible isn’t it. Once again the impact on the fans has been totally overlooked in all this.
If successful and there is a shred of the judgement that indicates this whole exercise has been nothing more than an exercise in reputational damage there should be a class action lawsuit against the prem for emotional distress [emoji3] Bankrupt the fuckers
what gets me is they say we only got off because it was time barred surely that just makes uefa look bad why bring charges if they all gonna be time barred carragher should think of that before opening his mouthCas was time barred and we got fined £20m. All the evidence you need right there
We had that set of crockery too.My grandad was one of the fruit sourcing managers for Robertsons in the 50s-70s.
We had loads of Gollyw*g crockery in our house growing up.
It seems to have disappeared now though for some reason…
I wonder who most people on here would think was posher if they met us; you or me?..0/2
Must do better.
****.
Spit should do the honourable thing and go for a swim in the Nile.what gets me is they say we only got off because it was time barred surely that just makes uefa look bad why bring charges if they all gonna be time barred carragher should think of that before opening his mouth
Just for clarity, there was only a very small subset of the charges that were time barred.what gets me is they say we only got off because it was time barred surely that just makes uefa look bad why bring charges if they all gonna be time barred carragher should think of that before opening his mouth