PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I'll never forget that **** saying he was renouncing his support for City because Thatcher elbowed Mendes.

Fucking soft twat.
If only we could pinpoint the reason why Simon Hattenstone doesnt like our owners.

Similar to Colin Schindler - both openly pining for the days when Swales ruled the roost, and we were shit and a laughing stock. I find them both particularly condescending.
 
Yes, the bulk of the monetisation is in the City worst case scenario conditional clauses, with, unfortunately too many City supporters happy to sell their club down the river in furtherance of their media prospects and bulging wallets. If City are vindicated, we're going to have to ask why there has been such a void in media coverage of the City defence, with particular scrutiny of the failure of supposed City supporters to air it. It's been virtually one-way traffic. I listened to the Blue Moon podcast the other week, and Nick Miller was the special guest. This is a guy when he was at The Guardian was responsible for the lowest kind of common denominator anti-City wummery. We might as well give up if these people are being entertained by City fans.

Mate - We can say with absolute certainty, that if we are vindicated, it will be brushed under the rug.

The quasi law informed city fan, will also brush over it or play it down - as was done with the APT stuff.. all they want is engagement and a few scraps from agenda driven media outlets.
 
I won't be keeping an eye on Sky Sports News each morning, waiting for a verdict - I won't need to.

My phone will light up like the Vegas Strip with messages off United fans!
 
The longer it goes the more I start to think something else has come to light in the hearing?? Maybe outside influences?
I'm probably the same as you (I think) - no news is bad news. Regardless of how successful we are, I'll never, ever kick that doom and gloom Blue in me. Always expect the nuclear option and anything else is a bonus. Maybe......
 
Sorry for the delay in replying (just to show I am prone to a little poetic license) I was just chatting to a couple of Miss Worlds about the relative benefits of my brassica, whilst eating a barm/muffin.
Anyway back too the thread.
 
This article annoys me, the whole idea is an infinite monkeys and infinite time if you change one you can’t do it, that’s the whole thing about infinity!!
ahh but...as I understand it...infinity has been revised ...its whole lifespan of universe now...which isn't long enough to get a bunch of monkeys knocking out the first line of a limerick..
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top