PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Can someone help me here, I am at a meeting on Thursday which has 2 rags and 2 dippers at it, so I want to be prepared.

1. Did Liverpool get an allowance of £50m (when they were about to fail ffp) for stadium redesign costs for a stadium rebuild that never took place?

2. Did chelsea pass psr (which they would have failed by hundreds of millions) by selling not one but two hotels, to themselves? Did they then benefit by selling their own women’s team to, you guessed it, themselves?

3. Have arsenal benefitted for years under psr and ffp by getting hundreds of millions in interest free loans that shouldn’t be allowed?

4. Have the rags passed psr which allows £105m cumulative losses over 3 years by managing to lose £400m over 4? Were they given a £41m Covid allowance to pass 1 year psr that nobody else was allowed more than £1m for? In a subsequent year to enable them to pass psr were they given a £35m allowance for selling shares from the current part owners to the new current part owners?

5. Is it correct to say that liverpool chelsea arsenal the rags and the premier league are all squeaky clean but Manchester City are corrupt as fuck?

Anything I missed or get wrong please advise
 
Milesvk said:
He thinks he is clever by stating stuff going back to 1900's, but fails to mention uniteds and Liverpools match fixing. Arsenal bribing the league to get promoted. He notes Leeds debtbut fails to mentions uniteds debt. He mentions forests breach by 35m but fails to mention united breach with UEFA and prem league, and we know the prem league breach is 75m but they were given allowances.
It's safe to say who instructs, pays or whatever to get him to write this type of article.
Click to expand...

I thought about critiquing it, but it really wasn't worth the effort .....
 
BringBackSwales said:
Can someone help me here, I am at a meeting on Thursday which has 2 rags and 2 dippers at it, so I want to be prepared.

1. Did Liverpool get an allowance of £50m (when they were about to fail ffp) for stadium redesign costs for a stadium rebuild that never took place?

2. Did chelsea pass psr (which they would have failed by hundreds of millions) by selling not one but two hotels, to themselves? Did they then benefit by selling their own women’s team to, you guessed it, themselves?

3. Have arsenal benefitted for years under psr and ffp by getting hundreds of millions in interest free loans that shouldn’t be allowed?

4. Have the rags passed psr which allows £105m cumulative losses over 3 years by managing to lose £400m over 4? Were they given a £41m Covid allowance to pass 1 year psr that nobody else was allowed more than £1m for? In a subsequent year to enable them to pass psr were they given a £35m allowance for selling shares from the current part owners to the new current part owners?

5. Is it correct to say that liverpool chelsea arsenal the rags and the premier league are all squeaky clean but Manchester City are corrupt as fuck?

Anything I missed or get wrong please advise
Click to expand...
6. Don’t forget to call them cunts.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
I know he has or had some great sources, as do I and others. But sometimes you're only getting part of the picture, or you or your source have interpreted stuff incorrectly. It's a bit like CAS saying that an email suggesting something could be done doesn't mean it was.

I was getting information on the Isco negotiations from someone involved (not from City btw) and everything had been done & dusted with the contract on the table ready to sign. Then it fell apart at the last second.
Click to expand...

Damn. They should have used a sturdier table .....
 
mexico1970 said:
It's like the **** is having a wet dream in public, what an arsehole.
Click to expand...
The author of “The anatomy of Manchester United” (not a best seller) writing a one sided article. You can almost feel him salivating at our potential downfall.

No integrity, no shame, no spine (won’t respond to City fans on Twitter). Hope the moneys worth it.

Yes I know, we should ignore. He’s hardly writing for the Times. But no other set of fans are treated like this
 
Vester said:
Having heavy restrictions on spending and severely punishing any club not abiding by these rules makes it difficult for clubs outside of the established PL teams to improve on the pitch from owner investment, which helps said clubs to protect their status as a PL club and getting that sweet TV money. For a club like Palace (I just use them as an example, not pointing the finger to them in particular), its in their best interest that other clubs cant threaten their status as a PL club if they happen to get a rich owner. All clubs with owners that are not interested in investing significant money themselves and are happy with the money flow from just being a PL club will of course oppose anything that makes it harder for them to compete. Even if they are competing for something other than trophies, like mainly competing to stay up.
Click to expand...
Absolutely right. Know a few palace fans who are just happy to see three poor teams doomed for bottom three so they are ok plus a decent cup run.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top