Roll call for 9 minute protest

stonerblue said:
Oh give over, and is that some sort of threat? I'll happily meet you to discuss what 'people won't forget'.
You've stomped all over this thread abusing poster after poster that you couldn't browbeat into your way of thinking.
And do you wanna show me 'the shit' i posted that has you so riled up?
Click to expand...
saloon-enter.gif
 
stonerblue said:
Oh give over, and is that some sort of threat? I'll happily meet you to discuss what 'people won't forget'.
You've stomped all over this thread abusing poster after poster that you couldn't browbeat into your way of thinking.
And do you wanna show me 'the shit' i posted that has you so riled up?
Click to expand...
Riled up? You? Lol
I'll let others judge your pre-protest comments mate. Again, everybody can read who was bothering and not
 
wearethesouthstand said:
They are not Japanese. That’s Lewis and Ellie both very clever one at Uni in Liverpool the other going to Cambridge in September both in 1894 and help with displays as does their mother Bess who is moving up to be one of the leaders from next season. I’ve never asked them if they were born here or born in Hong Kong or born in china and they weren’t next to the 1894 section they were in it and were also at the protest before the game

It’s not about the colour of someone’s skin or background it’s about fairness for tickets and not just giving them away to people who don’t care , yes grow a fan base but not to the detriment of losing the core support , the atmosphere identity fan culture and tradition of MCFC.
Click to expand...
You are going to have to accept that the fan culture of Manchester City will change because the demographics of Manchester is changing. When City are successful, local fans are going to come to the game, and if they do, they should be welcomed as City fans and not categorised as non-core fans.

Season ticket prices should be reduced in common with all tickets. Keep the demands simple and do not divide City's fanbase.
 
Damocles said:
I am still utterly baffled to what your problem has suddenly become and what all those references you made in your post the other day were.
Click to expand...
The X reference wasn’t about you. It was about ITK on transfers.

You made up some posts about me in the last week or two that weren’t true. No offence taken.

A lot of the time this place is just about having a laugh and not to be taken too seriously. For example, I am in awe of how you have managed to make X look reliable compared with Bluemoon.

Keep your chin up mate. I know when we’ve met in years gone by you’ve always come across as a good guy.
 
Marvin. said:
You are going to have to accept that the fan culture of Manchester City will change because the demographics of Manchester is changing. When City are successful, local fans are going to come to the game, and if they do, they should be welcomed as City fans and not categorised as non-core fans.

Season ticket prices should be reduced in common with all tickets. Keep the demands simple and do not divide City's fanbase.
Click to expand...

As long as they are not wearing Arsenal shirts and have had access to 30+ tickets they will be welcome, otherwise they wont be.

And nobody has to accept anything mate.
 
There's a distinct Off Topic feel to this thread and it's not a good thing for those if us who choose to steer clear of that cess pit.
 


Don't you want me, City?
Don't you want me? Oh...
Don't you want me City?
Don't you want me? Oh...
 
Marvin. said:
You are going to have to accept that the fan culture of Manchester City will change because the demographics of Manchester is changing. When City are successful, local fans are going to come to the game, and if they do, they should be welcomed as City fans and not categorised as non-core fans.

Season ticket prices should be reduced in common with all tickets. Keep the demands simple and do not divide City's fanbase.
Click to expand...
It’s not us dividing City fan base
Club is with their prices and ticket policy

They offer some fans a lower price rise than others. That’s done on purpose to divide the fan base.

Multi millionaires and billionaires getting the prices wrong and not taking people with them on one side, the whole country on the other side all unhappy and in a campaign called stop exploiting loyalty

If it has to be done again then it will be and it will be even bigger next time

You are also behind the times with your thought process as you were when for some reason you stood outside the ground the other night ?

1894 have people who are international students in Manchester, have banners designed and paid for people all over the world, all from different cultures themselves but they all buy into the culture Manchester City has had for the last 130 years where the loyalty of fans has counted

They also reject the club’s vision for the future which involves screwing everybody over

They also see the identity of Manchester City being lost

We’re the perfect example of integrating the old and the new fans

Accepting the club’s version of the future is akin to Neville chamberlain waving a piece of paper in the air in 1938 it is appeasement.

The new fans we have also want to be able to have a generational link to City.

Having empty seats comes from not listening to the fans for many years on various issues

It’s arrogance

They’ve compromised safety in the stadium for money. Adding new resellers will just make the scenes even worse next season.

Vast majority of fans know that the issue is fairness of tickets both prices and availability and not sacrificing our traditions on the altar of money.

Rushing back in after the goal is not doing what everyone else did. They saw the big picture. We scored and they stayed.

Appeasement or push for change.
 
Last edited:
United fans had some kind of sit in protest after the game and it’s look like maybe a few hundred people bothered to join in.

Fair play for trying to do something, but out of 70,000 barely anyone cares it seems. I honestly think our one single protest has had more impact and more fans joining in than most of theres.

Hopefully we don’t see that level of apathy
 
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
United fans had some kind of sit in protest after the game and it’s look like maybe a few hundred people bothered to join in.

Fair play for trying to do something, but out of 70,000 barely anyone cares it seems. I honestly think our one single protest has had more impact and more fans joining in than most of theres.

Hopefully we don’t see that level of apathy
Click to expand...
They probably mustered 70 protestors. Maybe because the rags have already announced their prices for next season and they are deluded enough to blame everything on the glazers and give Ratweazle a free pass
 
Last edited:
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
United fans had some kind of sit in protest after the game and it’s look like maybe a few hundred people bothered to join in.

Fair play for trying to do something, but out of 70,000 barely anyone cares it seems. I honestly think our one single protest has had more impact and more fans joining in than most of theres.

Hopefully we don’t see that level of apathy
Click to expand...
Would you want to sit in any longer after that shite
 
thegoatsthegoat said:
Would you want to sit in any longer after that shite
Click to expand...
All joking aside, a lot harder to get fans to stay back rather than what we did the other night. I expected United fans to back it in better numbers though, especially as they didn’t lose the match.

Not sure how we managed a much greater sit in in 1993 against QPR but we did. Probs 8000-10000 sat down on the Kippax alone
 
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
United fans had some kind of sit in protest after the game and it’s look like maybe a few hundred people bothered to join in.

Fair play for trying to do something, but out of 70,000 barely anyone cares it seems. I honestly think our one single protest has had more impact and more fans joining in than most of theres.

Hopefully we don’t see that level of apathy
Click to expand...
Some of the rag protest was in relation to long-term ST holders in their south stand being moved at short notice to make way for their tunnel club equivalent. A fan on the radio said they'd been told they would be allocated seats on the top tier of the piss-can stand which is certainly not an equivalent view. A rag on the radio this morning said it's pointless moving long-term fans if the club are only going to generate additional income for five or six years until they move.
Insert your own comments about seats with a poor view being better value at the swamp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top