LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
First response on the dot.Because none of the stands at the Etihad are a terrace on the Kippax Street I suppose.
First response on the dot.Because none of the stands at the Etihad are a terrace on the Kippax Street I suppose.
We should name a stand called "were not really here end"
Leeds......It’s a fine line between remembering, marking and respecting your club’s past and living in it.
Calling any of the stands at the Etihad ‘the Kippax’ would be doing the latter.
And which Kippax would we be naming it after?
You would be the 11th dead.....Does anyone know what happens if you die on Kippax Street?
109/110 and 111 have been referred to as the Kippax corner for years.
I'm not sure why the resistance to this idea. The Kippax is iconic and beloved fan name of a stand.
There are no rules to what something is known as.
Folk mentioning Kiippax St like it's incredulous to import that name are ridiculous.
It's just geography. How many took home pieces of the old Maine Rd turf to put in their gardens? Is that grass still the same now?
It's symbolic, like most things in life.
Anyway, I vote in favour of bringing back the name, and I would class myself at a lowly 10% on the MCFC nostalgia scale.
I think we missed a trick when we put the ‘singing’ section where it is and not in the relatively same position to the Kippax at the Etihad - opposite the players entrance.
The Popular Side! That takes me back a few decades. Most grounds had a "popular side", as opposed to where the toffs sat, in the main stand.I'm sure it was originally known as "The Popular Side" when it first opened in 1923, but was re-named in the 1950s when a roof was added to one of the largest terraces in the country.
I'm not sure why the resistance to this idea. The Kippax is iconic and beloved fan name of a stand.
There are no rules to what something is known as.
Folk mentioning Kiippax St like it's incredulous to import that name are ridiculous.
It's just geography. How many took home pieces of the old Maine Rd turf to put in their gardens? Is that grass still the same now?
It's symbolic, like most things in life.
Anyway, I vote in favour of bringing back the name, and I would class myself at a lowly 10% on the MCFC nostalgia scale.
It'll look great on the tellyAlso - what was unique about 'The Kippax' is it was along the side. No other club had that. We should carry that on. If the East Stand was renamed 'The Kippax' it would give us something no one else has. I'd put safe standing all along the bottom tier of the east stand and rename it.
Think you'll find Burnley, Birmingham City, Derby, Swansea, Cardiff to name a few had their main" ends" on the side. But the Kippax was the daddy of them all.Also - what was unique about 'The Kippax' is it was along the side. No other club had that. We should carry that on. If the East Stand was renamed 'The Kippax' it would give us something no one else has. I'd put safe standing all along the bottom tier of the east stand and rename it.
"You'll never take the Kippax!"Always thought that was great and fair play to them for continuing it on.
For me it's the use of rhe word 'The' as a prefix that gave 'The Kippax' such power and identity. Just like the The Kop. When a stand is the east stand or Platt Lane End it doesn't have any where near the power.
I could imagine it being a huge focal point of the stadium if the East Stand was renamed 'The Kippax' and the story continued for generations.
Think you'll find Burnley, Birmingham City, Derby, Swansea, Cardiff to name a few had their main" ends" on the side. But the Kippax was the daddy of them all.
Should have called the west stand the Stretford End pissed the rags off royally.