Are you Milibands unknown brother? Complete and utter drivel. If they are so cheap why do they need subsidising resulting in bills 30% higher.Renewable energy sources are the cheapest way to generate electricity.
Are you Milibands unknown brother? Complete and utter drivel. If they are so cheap why do they need subsidising resulting in bills 30% higher.Renewable energy sources are the cheapest way to generate electricity.
Listen, you boring ****. Either prove me wrong or shut the fuck up.Are you Milibands unknown brother? Complete and utter drivel. If they are so cheap why do they need subsidising resulting in bills 30% higher.
When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine we import at least 30% of our electricity from abroad. Explain that, ****.Listen, you boring ****. Either prove me wrong or shut the fuck up.
The sun is always shining. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how solar panels work.When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine we import at least 30% of our electricity from abroad. Explain that, ****.
Are you Milibands unknown brother? Complete and utter drivel. If they are so cheap why do they need subsidising resulting in bills 30% higher.
Such a restrictive technology.
Tweety seems a bit dim and I'm yet to see him back anything he says up.The sun is always shining. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how solar panels work.
What has that got to do with absolutely anything I have said?When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine we import at least 30% of our electricity from abroad. Explain that, ****.
He means it is cheaper to produce. Which it is, if we have the infrastructure it would also be cheaper on bills too. Energy companies would go out of business, lots of pensions affected, shareholders out of pocket etc.... lots of lobbying and fake news stories (I think) prevent us moving towards greener energy. But it is cheaper to produce.Are you Milibands unknown brother? Complete and utter drivel. If they are so cheap why do they need subsidising resulting in bills 30% higher.
Can you post one from mid December
Which has absolutely nothing to do with what you are arguing about. It also has nothing to do with Reform suggesting that they will try to prohibit investment in solar farms.Whatever power you are relying on from renewables needs the equivalent in backup from either nuclear, fossil or bought in from abroad, that's a fact.
Your statement actually empaphises my point.When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine we import at least 30% of our electricity from abroad. Explain that, ****.
They do work best in direct sunlight the photons jump about a bit more, last week solar provided almost 16% of our electricity supply which has got to be good news in anybodies book. only trouble being we do need fossil fuel back up capacity at least for the foreseeable future. The less we have to burn obviously better for us and the planet only beef I've got is we have these fossil fuels in the UK why the fuck aren't we continuing to exploit them inside of bringing them in. We have some of the best coal in the world but when British steel needed coking coal we have to fetch in from Australia work that one out.The sun is always shining. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how solar panels work.
So what?Whatever power you are relying on from renewables needs the equivalent in backup from either nuclear, fossil or bought in from abroad, that's a fact.
Energy is too expensive because it’s charged at the price of the most expensive fuel in the mix which these days is gas. No one’s managed to explain why that pricing formula can’t be changed.Natural resource energy power equals less profit and control by the corporates. Hence why it's "Too expensive"
Capitalism.Energy is too expensive because it’s charged at the price of the most expensive fuel in the mix which these days is gas. No one’s managed to explain why that pricing formula can’t be changed.
I’ve changed my mind, I don’t think tweety is a nuclear physicist.So what?
If a gas fired power station is on standby it’s not burning gas which is the whole point of using renewables. If gas consumption is reduced by 70% because it’s only needed when there’s no wind then that’s 70% less CO2 being released. It’s not rocket science.