Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
AND rags qualify for C/L.....Well they say bad things come in 3’s:
Lose the final
Don’t qualify for CL
Results are released.
That would definitely be a bad season.
AND rags qualify for C/L.....Well they say bad things come in 3’s:
Lose the final
Don’t qualify for CL
Results are released.
That would definitely be a bad season.
wheres the fun in that when they can drag it out even longerThe verdict needs to be announced on Monday with the season finally over no more dragging it out it’s been like a large dollop of shit hanging over this club disrupting all our plans and sponsorship deals also showing the PL in a bad light we don’t want this effecting the club next season for fucks sake either put up or shut the fuck up.
that could be classed as 4 in a row then or fourmidables ;-)AND rags qualify for C/L.....
Think that's was the idea all along, it's in no real interest for those who hate City for this to end soon. For me if City were to be found guilty it would of already been announced, but just keep it going on for as long as possible to ensure max damage.The verdict needs to be announced on Monday with the season finally over no more dragging it out it’s been like a large dollop of shit hanging over this club disrupting all our plans and sponsorship deals also showing the PL in a bad light we don’t want this effecting the club next season for fucks sake either put up or shut the fuck up.
I'm hoping for bank holiday Monday at 12:00 just as the dippers are getting ready for their paradeThe verdict needs to be announced on Monday with the season finally over no more dragging it out it’s been like a large dollop of shit hanging over this club disrupting all our plans and sponsorship deals also showing the PL in a bad light we don’t want this effecting the club next season for fucks sake either put up or shut the fuck up.
So much for free speech then. It's ok for an organisation to hide paedophiles in plain sight until the shit hits the fan but wrong to question anything on why they have an agenda about our club.Had this removed within 1 min .
Someone asked what about City
Your last two gags in here have been fantastic mate!You work for the PL then?
I heard Prof G talking about shit boards on his podcast. In this instance he was talking about HBO but his example made me think of this shit show & how they should have had the experience to stop Masters.
“A board kind of has three jobs.
1. If and when to sell the company.
2.Hiring and firing the CEO. Make sure you have the right guy or gal.
3. You should have some domain expertise on the board such that you can save the CEO from him or herself.”
We voted against and I think Leicester initially voted for PSR didn’t they?And the "what about City" brigade appear again, finding us guilty already and spouting more unproven and unsubstantiated shit about us
My simple question to each and every one of those people, would you still be spouting such shit if it was your club that was owned by Sheikh Mansour and had our riches and success? Somehow, I think they'll be singing a different tune.
Who and what podcast?I heard Prof G talking about shit boards on his podcast. In this instance he was talking about HBO but his example made me think of this shit show & how they should have had the experience to stop Masters.
“A board kind of has three jobs.
1. If and when to sell the company.
2.Hiring and firing the CEO. Make sure you have the right guy or gal.
3. You should have some domain expertise on the board such that you can save the CEO from him or herself.”
wish the innocent verdict would come when we are on the high rather than our worse season in like 10 years.
panel had full 6 months since the hearing is over.
I want Masters to resign, how the fuck he can stay in his job if we are innocent. but bout the witch hunt it caused...
Masters should have resigned when it was deemed the Premier League had ran an illegal rule book leaving them open to all sorts of problems. Then telling the clubs to vote on a solution that was still deemed illegal when City had told other clubs not to vote until the independent panel in the associated parties had fed back its recommendations. The guy has no shame and even after the 115 case he will still be clinging onto power unless he is pushed.
If you consider the rantings of a bunch of bitter journalists in msm and dickheads on social media as damage then fair enough.Think that's was the idea all along, it's in no real interest for those who hate City for this to end soon. For me if City were to be found guilty it would of already been announced, but just keep it going on for as long as possible to ensure max damage.
They will not find us guilty unless they can 100% prove we r guilty and are 100% confident that the evidence would stand up to any appeal at any court. You have got to remember who they would be accusing of fraud!!! The independent panel would be absolutely ruined unless 100% confident and have the evidence to back it up. This is much more than people/clubs being out to get us if they make a verdict which isn't water tight they will more than likely be sued to death off City
Balance of probabilities and all that.
Balance of probabilities isn’t 100%. Far from it.They will not find us guilty unless they can 100% prove we r guilty and are 100% confident that the evidence would stand up to any appeal at any court. You have got to remember who they would be accusing of fraud!!! The independent panel would be absolutely ruined unless 100% confident and have the evidence to back it up. This is much more than people/clubs being out to get us if they make a verdict which isn't water tight they will more than likely be sued to death off City.
The proof required to find us guilty of fraud is considerably higher than the balance of probabilities.Balance of probabilities isn’t 100%. Far from it.