PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
Thank you-ChatGPT!
 
When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
Or maybe it just takes a long time to write up and cross check responses for each one of over 100 charges....
 
When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
This is the thing with AI, it will answer the question you ask.

Problem in this instance is that we don’t know if the tribunal is taking an extended period. For all we know, the timeframe so far is less than anticipated and there’s a lot longer to go until we enter an “extended period”.
 
This is the thing with AI, it will answer the question you ask.

Problem in this instance is that we don’t know if the tribunal is taking an extended period. For all we know, the timeframe so far is less than anticipated and there’s a lot longer to go until we enter an “extended period”.
AI is just a glorified search engine, it amalgamates anything it finds on the internet to do with the request and gives you the answer in sentences to appear to be some highly intelligent guru, when really it's just giving you a mixed stew of collective noise.
 
Is it not true that those writing up the verdict were working off the original rap sheet and thus wasted three months trying to find any evidence that would allow them to reach a conclusion on whether the grass at the Etihad was cut to the right length, before moving onto the intractable problem of whether City entered the FA cup in the 2010-11, a problem made more complex by the absence of any evidence that City have a history. Even more problematic was the irrelevance of City's "irrefutable evidence" which had nothing to do with anything but finance!
 
The longer the case goes on the worse for City if the final verdict is innocent.
If it was likely to be guilty then how would City benefit by dragging it out? Better to take whatever punishment as soon as we could and then move on.
Surely if the Premier League cannot prove their accusations within a reasonable time frame then they need to be set aside?
If they had concrete evidence then the trial would be over by now.
 
The longer the case goes on the worse for City if the final verdict is innocent.
If it was likely to be guilty then how would City benefit by dragging it out? Better to take whatever punishment as soon as we could and then move on.
Surely if the Premier League cannot prove their accusations within a reasonable time frame then they need to be set aside?
If they had concrete evidence then the trial would be over by now.
The "trial" is over. It doesn't matter what evidence there is or isn't, the whole thing still needs writing up so all areas are lawfully covered and no grounds for appeal.
Leicester hearing last a few days but took 6-8 weeks to write up. I think Borson has already stated he has been part of hearings that lasted less than city case and took a year to find out the verdict.
 
The "trial" is over. It doesn't matter what evidence there is or isn't, the whole thing still needs writing up so all areas are lawfully covered and no grounds for appeal.
Leicester hearing last a few days but took 6-8 weeks to write up. I think Borson has already stated he has been part of hearings that lasted less than city case and took a year to find out the verdict.
Can they not ChatGPT it?
 
Can they not ChatGPT it?
eventually that will happen. tech is not there yet as lot of fake info gets through, but there will be a time in 5 or 10 years where for example after a hearing like this the decision will be written up in 5 second and not in 12 months.
 
AI is just a glorified search engine, it amalgamates anything it finds on the internet to do with the request and gives you the answer in sentences to appear to be some highly intelligent guru, when really it's just giving you a mixed stew of collective noise.
True within reason
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top