I suspect Wirtz may have just seen us play.Immunity from having to play within the Laws of the Game? Protection from being fouled by opposition cloggers?
I suspect Wirtz may have just seen us play.Immunity from having to play within the Laws of the Game? Protection from being fouled by opposition cloggers?
Thank you-ChatGPT!When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:
1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
Or maybe it just takes a long time to write up and cross check responses for each one of over 100 charges....When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:
1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
This is the thing with AI, it will answer the question you ask.When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:
1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
It's an interesting point what can the dippers offer that we couldn't to Wirtz?
Haaland chuckles.A former manager who told him how special the dippers were and how he should go and play there for a couple of years before he signs for Real Madrid?
AI is just a glorified search engine, it amalgamates anything it finds on the internet to do with the request and gives you the answer in sentences to appear to be some highly intelligent guru, when really it's just giving you a mixed stew of collective noise.This is the thing with AI, it will answer the question you ask.
Problem in this instance is that we don’t know if the tribunal is taking an extended period. For all we know, the timeframe so far is less than anticipated and there’s a lot longer to go until we enter an “extended period”.
Wasn't that a song by the Rolling Stones?Haaland chuckles.
Haaland chuckles.
There a City connection there.Wasn't that a song by the Rolling Stones?
The "trial" is over. It doesn't matter what evidence there is or isn't, the whole thing still needs writing up so all areas are lawfully covered and no grounds for appeal.The longer the case goes on the worse for City if the final verdict is innocent.
If it was likely to be guilty then how would City benefit by dragging it out? Better to take whatever punishment as soon as we could and then move on.
Surely if the Premier League cannot prove their accusations within a reasonable time frame then they need to be set aside?
If they had concrete evidence then the trial would be over by now.
Can they not ChatGPT it?The "trial" is over. It doesn't matter what evidence there is or isn't, the whole thing still needs writing up so all areas are lawfully covered and no grounds for appeal.
Leicester hearing last a few days but took 6-8 weeks to write up. I think Borson has already stated he has been part of hearings that lasted less than city case and took a year to find out the verdict.
You would think so, it provides answer's to life's problems.Can they not ChatGPT it?
a red pen you say...........................................................I used to cross check my social club accounts to the bank statements using a red pen as it stood out more than other colours.
eventually that will happen. tech is not there yet as lot of fake info gets through, but there will be a time in 5 or 10 years where for example after a hearing like this the decision will be written up in 5 second and not in 12 months.Can they not ChatGPT it?
Indeed!There a City connection there.
Bobb and Erl.
There a City connection there.
Bobb and Erl.
Just spotted its also a Norwegian connectionIndeed!
It's not ChatGPT, that takes up too much cache and spaceThank you-ChatGPT!
True within reasonAI is just a glorified search engine, it amalgamates anything it finds on the internet to do with the request and gives you the answer in sentences to appear to be some highly intelligent guru, when really it's just giving you a mixed stew of collective noise.