Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Although it wasn't i understand your thinkingThis lads time up.
I’d question his integrity today, match fixing all over it.
Although it wasn't i understand your thinkingThis lads time up.
I’d question his integrity today, match fixing all over it.
The hard part is “Which one should he have saved?”
Even if you shop 4 goals, if you can’t be blamed for any of them, then…
Their keeper shipped 3, but was their MOTM!!
Which was then fumbled in by their striker half a second later.Haha. Just seen a stat that he made his first save in the 114th minute. Madness.
The first goal he could have held the low cross instead of pushing it into danger.
Second, the only blame is to the defence (or the setup).
Third.... I think a top keeper gets their fingers to that header instead of waving at it as it goes past.
Fourth... I think he's unlucky tbh.
I think the main problem I have, is that this wasn't a particularly poor Ederson performance. He has his upsides, yes, but in terms of old fashioned goalkeeping, this was his normal level. So this is what we usually see game after game. It isn't really a high enough standard. His footballing skills help us dominate and control against weaker teams, but in big games, knockout games, someone who is a level above could make a huge difference.
He's been shocking with the ball at his feet in this tournament as well, putting us under pressure needlessly. The first goal he should have been able to parry away from danger and the third he should have saved. He came for the ball then hesitated and went back to his line then just watched the ball go past him. They didn't create a huge amount and when you think of the top keepers out there I think they probably save the two I've mentioned and potentially the 1 v 1 chance they had for their second goal.
It sounds harsh, but it's going to keep costing us success. If his passing was faultless and helping the team win I could understand it. But Al Hilal were well organised - they didn't let that long ball happen. So Ederson is back to being a traditional goalkeeper and he's simply not good enough and hasn't been for a while now.
Totally agree.
He's not the only keeper who can play football any more, and when that part of his game doesn't go well and isn't a strength, then overall he becomes a liability.
Even though he had no chance with at least 3 of the goals?This lads time up.
I’d question his integrity today, match fixing all over it.
Really?Even though he had no chance with at least 3 of the goals?
I don’t think we can - that’s why he said he’s staying. Don’t think any Saudi club is paying his transfer fee plus wages. They’re just waiting for him to be a free transfer.cant be arsed anymore. cash in before he leaves for nothing.
Well, go on then.The header he had no chance, the one on one where our set up from our own corner was Sunday league stuff. The other header he did well to actually save.So the only one was the cross shot he parried but i’m struggling to think of a modern keeper who doesn’t do that. Not trying to say he’s a great actual goalkeeper by the way.Really?
I’m sorry but parry it anywhere but the middle of the goal. Both keepers not at the required level.Well, go on then.The header he had no chance, the one on one where our set up from our own corner was Sunday league stuff. The other header he did well to actually save.So the only one was the cross shot he parried but i’m struggling to think of a modern keeper who doesn’t do that. Not trying to say he’s a great actual goalkeeper by the way.
Well, go on then.The header he had no chance, the one on one where our set up from our own corner was Sunday league stuff. The other header he did well to actually save.So the only one was the cross shot he parried but i’m struggling to think of a modern keeper who doesn’t do that. Not trying to say he’s a great actual goalkeeper by the way.