heslops barnet
Well-Known Member
Duckett…..fuck it
The question was why the sky graphic clearly said review retainedthey don’t keep the review
NoTbf, Crawley has faced most deliveries this morning and has battled his way through. Will he last?
It means chances for the team to review decisions.The question was why the sky graphic clearly said review retained
They’d already reviewed and the review said “wickets missing” but the sly graphic clearly said “review retained”. They don’t get to review the review, not even IndiaIt means chances for the team to review decisions.
I don’t think It’ll be that high mate. 240 would be very difficult with Archer and Stokes bowling from the nursery endWould a lead of 300 give us a good chance?
Was that the game where Curtly Ambrose took 6 wickets for 2 runs or something like that ?What the fuck is this wicket? This is like Kingstone In 1998 from one end
Monday’s day 5 mate so that would only give us around 60 overs to bowl them out!If we can hold out until lunch on monday (big if!), declare and set them a target around 400.
I was aware of that, but I was looking at a point where it'd be hard to see us losing. If India somehow managed to score at nearly 7 per over to achieve that hypothetical 400 (a total rarely achieved in the fourth innings in a test),that'd be staggering. Whereas a target of, say, 300 (5 rpo) would be "gettable". But thanks anyway.Monday’s day 5 mate so that would only give us around 60 overs to bowl them out!
Get that West Indies lad back in the team, he looked like he could bat.Englands top 3 is fucking abysmal. Pope can’t bat, can’t field, I am sure he is a nice lad though