City extend their partnership with Puma to 2034/2035

Kippax Street 1880 said:
Think they were Suedes and maybe Palermo's. I can't really tell the difference between the States and Suedes but I'll defer to your superior Puma knowledge.

I have a black pair of suedes I wear to the races as I hate wearing dress shoes and I must say they are much more comfortable than Gazelles. I'm mainly an AirMax man.
Click to expand...
Puma Suede's will have the leaping Puma on the heal, Clyde's just have the white circle with no Puma,
States are similar to Clyde's and are a more premium version of Puma suede's, with subtle differences.

Trainers eh !
 
dickie davies said:
It's their brand's logo, so of course they're going to be prominent
Would Nike produce a kit without their swoosh?
Click to expand...
Johan Cruyff, known for being a narky rum bugger, used to tear at least one of the stripes off on his Adidas Netherlands kits and made a point of wearing Puma king boots to piss Adidas off even more
 
KS55 said:
And that shows what nonsense FMV is. We are not ‘related’ to Puma so FMV should not apply. Is that right?
Question: is the £100m for CFG, with £70m being for City?
Click to expand...
Sorry, I get that we’re not related to Puma so no issue around that.

I was just making the point that the PL fucked up our other sponsorship with the FMV nonsense. But Puma will pay us this ridiculous amount.
It’s contradictory to their FMV findings.
But with the 115, to me they’re just out to fuck us over.
 
Brilliant. Will we be able to invest some of this into buying first team players? Eg, Livramento and a pacy, goalscoring midfielder?
 
That figure surpasses the £90m deal signed by rivals Manchester United with Adidas in 2023, while champions Liverpool will also be with the same manufacturer from this season after agreeing a reported, external £60m a season.
 
Shaggy said:
Johan Cruyff, known for being a narky rum bugger, used to tear at least one of the stripes off on his Adidas Netherlands kits and made a point of wearing Puma king boots to piss Adidas off even more
Click to expand...
It was because he was sponsored by Puma.

As were Pele and Maradona and City…seems to be a theme.
 
Irlamblue said:
That figure surpasses the £90m deal signed by rivals Manchester United with Adidas in 2023, while champions Liverpool will also be with the same manufacturer from this season after agreeing a reported, external £60m a season.
Click to expand...
Plus United only get that £90m a season if they met certain conditions which they have failed to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top