The irony is the shite that started most weeks wasn't performing better than him last year. We remained loyal to underperforming and out of form players.
Nah, they did. He didn't perform when he was in earlier on in the season. Then had niggles here and there. Was in and out and by the time he got back to full health, others were performing better.
I mean Nunes in 3 games on the wing damn near outproduced Grealish's whole season. And Nunes didn't even get to keep his spot.
By mid season, Marmoush came in and was producing Then Doku had a stretch when he was our only outlet for creativity. All 3 were significantly more productive than Grealish.
Even the often maligned Savio was producing early doors before he lost form during the downturn and never got it back.
But all 4 names I've mentioned outproduced Grealish.
Although I think they are all of similar talent levels with differing flaws. Grealish was the weakest at goals and assists production.
His lows may not have been as low as Savio's awful period. But his highs were always 'Meh.'
I can see why a manager would rather give the chance to a guy whomight hit a 9/10 performance even though he has many 2/10 games in him over a guy who is a constantly giving you a 6/10.
While, i wholely disagreed with Pep's decision at the time ( and still now) that was probably the reason he went with EcheMessi in the final over Grealish.
Grealish is who you want to put in when you are up 2 and want to run out the clock. He is not the guy you want to bring on to chase a goal.
Every attacking player we have including, Echemessi, Bobb, and Even Nunes, are better options when urgency and chasing a goal is the situation.
Its just what it is. A great servant, good player, and wonderful lad ( I've heard), but the facts are the facts