Alexander Isak | Cried his way to a £130m move

I wonder how players would feel about these long term contracts if there was a clause in them that said if you dont play well or your performances are substandard we can cut your wages in half.
 
Should make him play in the reserves. I know players have some leverage but downing tools because the club won't sell him for cut price is poor.
 
Obviously a line fed to Ornstein by the scousers

I’ve got a feeling that Newcastle won’t budge on this as a matter of principle

Once the window closes he will be forced to sign a new deal with a release clause for next summer , the ball is in his court then as whether to play or not

We didn’t budge on Tevez even when he went on a golfing holiday for three months and had a complete relationship breakdown with the manager

We didn’t even sell him the following summer and waited until we felt we could absorb his loss with other signings
 
Obviously a line fed to Ornstein by the scousers

I’ve got a feeling that Newcastle won’t budge on this as a matter of principle

Once the window closes he will be forced to sign a new deal with a release clause for next summer , the ball is in his court then as whether to play or not

We didn’t budge on Tevez even when he went on a golfing holiday for three months and had a complete relationship breakdown with the manager

We didn’t even sell him the following summer and waited until we felt we could absorb his loss with other signings
It’s a bit crazy this move by Isaks people.
He is going all in now and if Newcastle don’t cave he is fucked
For me Newcastle should stand firm if only as a matter of principle now
If it was me I would start negotiations with Liverpool, drag them out till end of August then tell them to get fucked an hour before the deadline
 
If true then thats not a wise move when he's contracted to a club with mega rich owners who have already shown, by not bending over to the scousers, that they wont be pushed around. The Arab nation values respect and loyalty very highly and, they may well see this as an insult and dig their heels in

A great many footballers appear to see a contract as a one way thing that is there for them and not for both sides. A club signs the deal committed, with little get out, to pay x for y years regardless of the players performance who, could get injury very early in the contract and never play again yet, the club still has to honor it. Players seem to believe that they can effectively get out of it anyhow they choose Well, I hope they screw him big style
 
This is honestly embarrassing behaviour from Isak and he's being advised badly. Even that explanation fed out about how his contract wouldn't be renegotiated until they'd sorted PSR issues doesn't put him in a good light. It's not even Newcastle reneging on any agreement to let him leave etc, it's just him being greedy.

Sidenote, that transfer update was overwhelmingly deferential to Liverpool & United, while not giving us our own section, despite 3 senior players leaving & rumours abound at replacement. Really pathetic and I'm glad I just use archive.is rather than paying
 
Isak isn't on250k p/w. He is on about 70k. Still a good wage but for a player they value at £150m?

Apparently Staveley told him they were upping his wages. She left and he was then told they couldn't do it. I'd be shocked IF any of the top 6-8 club in the Premier League can't afford to pay their star player the going rate.

Didn't the 3 year period for PSR reset during this summer? I get that there is a knock on effect with other players in the squad. Every other club finds financial loopholes when they need it!
They could have gifted him the women's team then bought it back for £200k p/w! lol
 
If true then thats not a wise move when he's contracted to a club with mega rich owners who have already shown, by not bending over to the scousers, that they wont be pushed around. The Arab nation values respect and loyalty very highly and, they may well see this as an insult and dig their heels in

A great many footballers appear to see a contract as a one way thing that is there for them and not for both sides. A club signs the deal committed, with little get out, to pay x for y years regardless of the players performance who, could get injury very early in the contract and never play again yet, the club still has to honor it. Players seem to believe that they can effectively get out of it anyhow they choose Well, I hope they screw him big style
Not sure what mega rich owners has to do with it? PSR transcends rich owners and due to PSR they can’t allow a £120m plus asset to rot in the reserves, the dippers know this which is why their illegal approach has been made, cunts
 
Will he get booed at every ground he goes to now if he dos join the scousers and vilified by every pundit and reporter out there.

I seem to remember when Raheem Sterling left the scousers to join us that was the treatment that he got and was accepted as normal by everyone for the way he behaved...

I wonder if it will work when the shoe is on the other foot...I expect not
 
Will he get booed at every ground he goes to now if he dos join the scousers and vilified by every pundit and reporter out there.

I seem to remember when Raheem Sterling left the scousers to join us that was the treatment that he got and was accepted as normal by everyone for the way he behaved...

I wonder if it will work when the shoe is on the other foot...I expect not

Same for Grealish when he dared to join us. Everton fans cheering for him now though
 
Last edited:
Obviously a line fed to Ornstein by the scousers

I’ve got a feeling that Newcastle won’t budge on this as a matter of principle

Once the window closes he will be forced to sign a new deal with a release clause for next summer , the ball is in his court then as whether to play or not

We didn’t budge on Tevez even when he went on a golfing holiday for three months and had a complete relationship breakdown with the manager

We didn’t even sell him the following summer and waited until we felt we could absorb his loss with other signings
... and despite all that we won the league. Tevez coming back into the side helped. Norwich away was memorable and not just for the golf swing celebration!
 
Isak isn't on250k p/w. He is on about 70k. Still a good wage but for a player they value at £150m?

Apparently Staveley told him they were upping his wages. She left and he was then told they couldn't do it. I'd be shocked IF any of the top 6-8 club in the Premier League can't afford to pay their star player the going rate.

Didn't the 3 year period for PSR reset during this summer? I get that there is a knock on effect with other players in the squad. Every other club finds financial loopholes when they need it!
They could have gifted him the women's team then bought it back for £200k p/w! lol
PSR never resets - or does every year depending on how you look at it.
It's a rolling 3 year period.
 
Not sure what mega rich owners has to do with it? PSR transcends rich owners and due to PSR they can’t allow a £120m plus asset to rot in the reserves, the dippers know this which is why their illegal approach has been made, cunts
I was thinking in terms as to how they will view it on a personal level rather than PSR Agree that it wouldn't make sense to let the asset rot in the reserves but equally so Isak wont want to either in WC year question of who blinks first I would bet Isak
 
If he is refusing to play then, yes, he's in breach of his contract and has a liability for potential damages if the club suffers a loss as a result. Where this goes is anybody's guess, but usually, as we've seen before, the player leaves eventually.
The bus-wrecking, whingeing, candle-lighting, bin-dipping, computer-hacking, murderous scouse cunts will probably get to steal their man, eventually, and his formerly glowing reputation as one of football's nice guys will be gone forever - but for a £10M signing on fee and £300k/week, he'll probably learn to live with that.
I hope the Geordies can get £150m for him.
 
PSR never resets - or does every year depending on how you look at it.
It's a rolling 3 year period.
I mean in terms of a club declaring their accounts for that year. The next few years may well be better projected revenues. Prize money, TV revenue and sponsorship, for example, might mean a club can afford to do the new contract on the next balance sheet?

I am no PSR expert! trying to apply some basic logic! Although that could be why I am going wrong! lol
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top