Russian invasion of Ukraine

SPIDERBOY said:
In a televised interview,he says it as it is.

Portugal’s President Rebelo de Sousa:

“The top leader of the world’s foremost superpower is, objectively, a Soviet or Russian asset. He operates as an asset.”

Slava Ukraini.
Click to expand...
Everyone has been saying it.Its about time a few of the spineless fuckwitts including Starmer repeat this..
 
mrcunny said:
Everyone has been saying it.Its about time a few of the spineless fuckwitts including Starmer repeat this..
Click to expand...
Whilst Starmer has been playing a prudent and strategic game with Trump to date, his current approach surely cannot endure. Something will have to surely give eventually. Appeasement is only justifiable for as long as it remains objectively (and broadly) effective.
 
mrcunny said:
Everyone has been saying it.Its about time a few of the spineless fuckwitts including Starmer repeat this..
Click to expand...
We are not in the position of strength. Like it or not.
Patience and smart play are what we need now first of all.

How would trump react if European leaders speak out what they think (only to make you feel good for a minute)?

Knowing trump's status behaviour, what would be the risk for UKR concerning weapon and intelligence supply
or tariffs for EU / UK?

What would you expect?
 
St.Pauli support said:
We are not in the position of strength. Like it or not.
Patience and smart play are what we need now first of all.

How would trump react if European leaders speak out what they think (only to make you feel good for a minute)?

Knowing trump's status behaviour, what would be the risk for UKR concerning weapon and intelligence supply
or tariffs for EU / UK?

What would you expect?
Click to expand...
So, in the meantime, Russia will remain emboldened to level as much as Ukraine as it wants whilst Trump muses.
 
probably unrelated to anything but there seems to be quite a few US airforce planes about today. 3/4 super hercules have flown over our house from Shannon over towards Europe this morning.
 
Ronnie the Rep said:
Is the figure given for Russian artillery destroyed actual guns? If so, how come they haven’t run out?
Click to expand...
They have had many many in storage accumulated from the Cold War. They are not as complicated as a tank, and far easier to store for years/decades with hardly any maintenance.
The number of Russian tanks lost is astonishing, until you see the satellite pictures of their (now depleted) tank compounds - the size and quantity… and the age t-54, t-62, t-64 …
 
Ronnie the Rep said:
Is the figure given for Russian artillery destroyed actual guns? If so, how come they haven’t run out?
Click to expand...
Russia is getting lots of artillery from North Korea. Prior to getting nukes, North Korea used masses of artillery guns pointed at Seoul as its main threat. Once they got nukes, they use nukes/missiles instead, so have a ton of spare artillery guns and shells to sell to Russia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top