PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

according to the search engine on here...

the first time you used it was 8th feb 2013,
to m.e.s.

you then used it a further 385 times up until 26th feb 2017,
to millwayawayveteran1988.




i know, i'm sad, but i was sure it was that way :)
and you probably won't like me
Ok, 48 months.
 
Having seen the email exchange and checked multiple elements of it (things like the working linkedin link), I think it is real. On top of that it matches exactly what other sources have said.

As for being wrong, if I am wrong, I am wrong. Who cares. But as it is I am trying, in good faith, to help fans understand the situation and to not be mislead by people claiming things that I do not believe to be true based on my information.
Damm I missed that email. I wonder what it said?
 
according to the search engine on here...

the first time you used it was 8th feb 2013,
to m.e.s.

you then used it a further 385 times up until 26th feb 2017,
to millwayawayveteran1988.




i know, i'm sad, but i was sure it was that way :)
and you probably won't like me
if you've gone to such effort why not publish his top 10 or maybe top 3.
 
Sadly me too, though I sincerely hope you are wrong. We've all had enough of this bullshit hanging over the club and us for what seems like forever.

I would happily take City losing on some parts BUT only if all pl clubs are investigated as much as City have been.

The whole thing is a fucking whitch hunt, rags have been allowed extra covid allowance, dippers sponsorship by a gun running money laundering bank.

Once all pl clubs have had their finances checked over with a fine tooth comb for 4 years I will never except any fines.
 
I would happily take City losing on some parts BUT only if all pl clubs are investigated as much as City have been.

The whole thing is a fucking whitch hunt, rags have been allowed extra covid allowance, dippers sponsorship by a gun running money laundering bank.

Once all pl clubs have had their finances checked over with a fine tooth comb for 4 years I will never except any fines.
More chance of seeing Pannick v Masters on one of those gimpy influencer 'boxing' cards than seeing a team in red get investigated
 
I would happily take City losing on some parts BUT only if all pl clubs are investigated as much as City have been.

The whole thing is a fucking whitch hunt, rags have been allowed extra covid allowance, dippers sponsorship by a gun running money laundering bank.

Once all pl clubs have had their finances checked over with a fine tooth comb for 4 years I will never except any fines.
Correct - and the longer this drags on the longer it allows the red shirt clubs to cover up their misdeeds before they are investigated ...... it stinks from day one
 
if you've gone to such effort why not publish his top 10 or maybe top 3.
i'm not that sad :)































































probably because mine would be no.1
when, after he wrote "daring-do" i mentioned that "derring-do" was more widely preferred,
even though it in itself, when first used, was a mistake...

it originates from the middle-english "dorrying-don" (daring to do),
but someone spelt it incorrectly at some stage as "derryinge don",
which modern writers eventually changed to "derring-do".
 
this delicious strapline defined you for years.

not sure why you stopped using it.
i have a vague memory of you trying to replace it with something that proved to be less successful.

i vote you bring it back more often.
A heavyweight strapline by a heavyweight poster.

Not sure it reaches the heights of his “you disrespectful motherfucker” days though.

What a geezer.
 
If the Premier League are successful it will be released 10.00am.

If City are successful it will be released at 10.00am.

The papers already have crash editions written up for both outcomes and background.
What if it’s somewhere in the middle? It’s not likely to be a “we won, you lost” outcome imo mate
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top