PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[madloaf]

If the Premier League are successful it will be released 10.00am.

If City are successful it will be released at 10.00am.

The papers already have crash editions written up for both outcomes and background.

What are "Papers"? I get all my information from football365. Very reputable.

 

[calumdown]

It was months at most.

according to the search engine on here...

the first time you used it was 8th feb 2013,
to m.e.s.

you then used it a further 385 times up until 26th feb 2017,
to millwayawayveteran1988.




i know, i'm sad, but i was sure it was that way :)
and you probably won't like me

 

[halfcenturyup]

according to the search engine on here...

the first time you used it was 8th feb 2013,
to m.e.s.

you then used it a further 385 times up until 26th feb 2017,
to millwayawayveteran1988.




i know, i'mm a saddo :)

He never used it with me :( The disrespectful motherfucker.

 

[calumdown]

He never used it with me :( The disrespectful motherfucker.

i got 3, so there :)

(which, if i'm not mistaken, is 0.775% of the total)

 

[Centurions]

Nothing today?

Let me just pick my jaw up off the floor

I saw a headline from football365 that said it's definitely this week if that helps?

 

[dadnlad]

What are "Papers"? I get all my information from football365. Very repuatable.

need to up your imput to \The Echo

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

He never used it with me :( The disrespectful motherfucker.

Only because he doesn’t… ;-)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

according to the search engine on here...

the first time you used it was 8th feb 2013,
to m.e.s.

you then used it a further 385 times up until 26th feb 2017,
to millwayawayveteran1988.




i know, i'm sad, but i was sure it was that way :)
and you probably won't like me

Ok, 48 months.

 

[applecentral]

Having seen the email exchange and checked multiple elements of it (things like the working linkedin link), I think it is real. On top of that it matches exactly what other sources have said.

As for being wrong, if I am wrong, I am wrong. Who cares. But as it is I am trying, in good faith, to help fans understand the situation and to not be mislead by people claiming things that I do not believe to be true based on my information.

Damm I missed that email. I wonder what it said?

 

[calumdown]

Ok, 48 months.

i can tell that you are annoyed with me now,
so i won't point out that it is 49.

 

[Lord Blue]

according to the search engine on here...

the first time you used it was 8th feb 2013,
to m.e.s.

you then used it a further 385 times up until 26th feb 2017,
to millwayawayveteran1988.




i know, i'm sad, but i was sure it was that way :)
and you probably won't like me

if you've gone to such effort why not publish his top 10 or maybe top 3.

 

[give it to gordon]

Sadly me too, though I sincerely hope you are wrong. We've all had enough of this bullshit hanging over the club and us for what seems like forever.

I would happily take City losing on some parts BUT only if all pl clubs are investigated as much as City have been.

The whole thing is a fucking whitch hunt, rags have been allowed extra covid allowance, dippers sponsorship by a gun running money laundering bank.

Once all pl clubs have had their finances checked over with a fine tooth comb for 4 years I will never except any fines.

 

[give it to gordon]

A bloody year to write this up and deliver the outcome is more than enough time. Its at the point now where i feel this is a catastrophic finding for one party and i can only hope that's the PL.

Why can't they just tell us the verdict and then write it up ?

 

[theholysmurf]

I would happily take City losing on some parts BUT only if all pl clubs are investigated as much as City have been.

The whole thing is a fucking whitch hunt, rags have been allowed extra covid allowance, dippers sponsorship by a gun running money laundering bank.

Once all pl clubs have had their finances checked over with a fine tooth comb for 4 years I will never except any fines.

More chance of seeing Pannick v Masters on one of those gimpy influencer 'boxing' cards than seeing a team in red get investigated

 

[theholysmurf]

Why can't they just tell us the verdict and then write it up ?

Rules of procedure, transparency and impartiality

 

[give it to gordon]

More chance of seeing Pannick v Masters on one of those gimpy influencer 'boxing' cards than seeing a team in red get investigated

Maybe but that shouldn't be the case we all know rags use the red football ltd for the pl accounts. Why is that ?

 

[spinney]

I would happily take City losing on some parts BUT only if all pl clubs are investigated as much as City have been.

The whole thing is a fucking whitch hunt, rags have been allowed extra covid allowance, dippers sponsorship by a gun running money laundering bank.

Once all pl clubs have had their finances checked over with a fine tooth comb for 4 years I will never except any fines.

Correct - and the longer this drags on the longer it allows the red shirt clubs to cover up their misdeeds before they are investigated ...... it stinks from day one

 

[calumdown]

if you've gone to such effort why not publish his top 10 or maybe top 3.

i'm not that sad :)































































probably because mine would be no.1
when, after he wrote "daring-do" i mentioned that "derring-do" was more widely preferred,
even though it in itself, when first used, was a mistake...

it originates from the middle-english "dorrying-don" (daring to do),
but someone spelt it incorrectly at some stage as "derryinge don",
which modern writers eventually changed to "derring-do".

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

i can tell that you are annoyed with me now,
so i won't point out that it is 49.

I had a month off in the middle.

 

[give it to gordon]

If you missed the first few days you would never know Chelsea have 70 odd charges against them, that rags were fined for braking Uefa ffp rules. Yet the press/media never let our charges out of the media !