The trouble is when West Ham get a ridiculous decision against them what does it really matter? The difference between maybe finishing 13th or 14th in the league? There's no immediate impact on the season so I can understand why you concentrate on the few decisions they get right with it.
When absolutely baffling, indescribably wrong or just plain missing VAR decisions cost you losing an FA Cup Final, getting knocked out of the Champions League, or losing a big derby match, you may begin to understand why people here hate it and the impact it's had on the league, the bottom of the barrel standards of officiating and how VAR has made it so that cheating is now a huge part of how well a team does in a season.
Sure a few decisions are right and people like yourself may think the trade off of a few correct decisions is worth losing the flow, drama and pure joy of celebrating a goal. But when you've lost the joy of the game and it's still getting the kind of wrong decisions it was brought in to correct wrong then what's the point?
If it can't be used to spot a goalkeeper handling the ball outside the box
spot a blatant handball from a defender that leads to a goal for the opposition
View attachment 172492
, spot that an offside player is clearly interfering with play despite not touching the ball
View attachment 172493
or can spot that a players heel may be 1mm offside despite the cameras not being quick enough to record this accurately and the wrong frame being used regarding the ball leaving the attacking players foot
View attachment 172494
but during the same match the referee won't be shown the most obvious angle showing a handball goal
View attachment 172495then what is it really good for?
Spotting that a player brushed against Salah which means him throwing himself to the ground as if shot is definitely a penalty as "there's contact so he's entitled to go down?"
View attachment 172496