The Labour Government

stan bowles said:
So every time she trots out the line "The last 14 years...", she really means 13 years of Conservative Governments and 1 year of Labour. Just wish she'd be honest with people - the economy is in a total mess and taxes are going up.
Click to expand...
I think you're being a bit pedantic. We all know it was 14 years of Tory lead shit. But admittedly her script writer need a talking to.
 
TinFoilHat said:
If true Reeves has arbitrated anything over £45,000 is not a working wage I suspect my train driving colleagues will be pissed off when they get taxed on their last pay rise.
Click to expand...
A junior doctor also isnt on a working wage, neither are many senior qualified teachers or teachers who take on extra responsibility. Its messy divisive wording and stems from their ever shifting definition of a working person.
 
Kompany Car said:
A junior doctor also isnt on a working wage, neither are many senior qualified teachers or teachers who take on extra responsibility. Its messy divisive wording and stems from their ever shifting definition of a working person.
Click to expand...
And no doubt it'll be further arbitrated as the years go by.
 
Kompany Car said:
Well there kind of is, but it doesn't break it down to a low level its at best chunks of 0.5Bn. Trying to dig any further down is difficult. Some might say beyond that point its in the noise on a national scale but if we use the silly analogy, that politicians love of a countries spending and income being like that of a household, taking care of the pennies (tens of millions), might just help.
Click to expand...

Agree.

It's the sub £500m amounts though that are of most concern for corruption.

Some councils in particular have quite a bit to answer for as to where they have spent their allocated money.
 
BTH said:
You are correct. I am absolutely ideologically opposed to privatisation.

What's more surprising is that you think concentrating the power and might of formerly nationally owned companies into the hands of a small group of people is a good idea, especially given that the government has to bail these companies out when it inevitably goes pear-shaped!

You'll find that most "first world" nations have flag carrying airlines. We are no different; call it soft power if you like.

Rolls Royce is owned by BMW these days but it makes some sense for any government to have a hand in an important military hardware supplier.
Click to expand...

It’s possible to make a case for the government to have its hand in pretty much most things, it doesn’t mean they should. Nor does it mean they never should, for example after WW2 or the financial crisis it made sense to nationalise certain things for a while.
 
dickie davies said:
Fuel tax is moving up and down all the time due to the VAT element

I would add to your second paragraph that benefits need to be seriously looked at
It's an area that politicians don't want to go near because it's such an unpopular topic, but there needs to be changes

And before anyone calls me a nasty selfish twat, there is a close relative of mine who has taken very easy street along with his partner and her father all claiming when there is fuck all wrong with any of them and somehow they all claim carers allowance for each other

Didn't someone post on here the other week that there are more people claiming than paying in at the moment!
Click to expand...
As an ex-DSS fraud officer I hope you've rung 0800 854440.
 
Blue Maverick said:
The thing is the increase allegedly in taxis to plug the black hole, so it’s not going to improve anything it’s just trying to get level, so nothing for us will change except have less money to spend, so the economy will suffer. I really don’t know what the solution is.
Click to expand...

That’s exactly right mate. If it was going on something other than just keeping the lights on we might see something that resembles a plan.
 
Gorbachev said:
It astonishes me that in a democratic country, the electorate don't have the means to go on a website to see exactly where their money is going and who it is going to in an easy to read system and graph.

It would eliminate a lot of the bickering between the parties on any of the money issues and would allow the public to decipher fully and question any parties ambitions of changing the spending.

Any money investigated or caught off the books should equal a permanent expulsion from that party ever getting back into power with it's leaders put in a courtroom for trials of corruption and treason.
Click to expand...
Do you mean the annual budget statement that's published by the treasury?
 
hilts said:
Its difficult to sell train drivers wages not being decent mate.
Click to expand...
Dont think its a case of decent or not, why they cant just say we dont have a pot to piss in so unfortunately we are going to have to up the tax paid by teachers, doctors, train drivers and anyone else who might pay the higher rate of tax, is beyond me. All this working people/wage is just meaningless and just serves to wind up those who obviously are working people but earn over the 40% tax threshold.
 
Kompany Car said:
Dont think its a case of decent or not, why they cant just say we dont have a pot to piss in so unfortunately we are going to have to up the tax paid by teachers, doctors, train drivers and anyone else who might pay the higher rate of tax, is beyond me. All this working people/wage is just meaningless and just serves to wind up those who obviously are working people but earn over the 40% tax threshold.
Click to expand...
They fucked up by promising no tax raises for 'working people'

People voted for them what can I say?

Politicians will spend plenty of their spare time with rich folks and the gentry, whose gonna get shafted their party guests or the oinks.

If Labour aren't gonna try and make it all a bit fairer by making the elite pay their fair share then seriously what's the point.
 
hilts said:
They fucked up by promising no tax raises for 'working people'

People voted for them what can I say?

Politicians will spend plenty of their spare time with rich folks and the gentry, whose gonna get shafted their party guests or the oinks.

If Labour aren't gonna try and make it all a bit fairer by making the elite pay their fair share then seriously what's the point.
Click to expand...
It was interesting to hear what Richard Murphy had to say only a few minutes after the press conference.

 
dickie davies said:
Fuel tax is moving up and down all the time due to the VAT element

I would add to your second paragraph that benefits need to be seriously looked at
It's an area that politicians don't want to go near because it's such an unpopular topic, but there needs to be changes

And before anyone calls me a nasty selfish twat, there is a close relative of mine who has taken very easy street along with his partner and her father all claiming when there is fuck all wrong with any of them and somehow they all claim carers allowance for each other

Didn't someone post on here the other week that there are more people claiming than paying in at the moment!
Click to expand...
I think that was that when you add in education, health care, and other "benefits" funded by taxes, most people are net beneficiaries of the system (i.e. most get more value than they pay in taxes) while only a minority pay more tax than they get out of the system.
 
Dazzle84 said:
Do you mean the annual budget statement that's published by the treasury?
Click to expand...

I would want a completely detailed, no nonsense breakdown to the last penny of where the money is going and who it's going to, and not shadowed by clever names and titles.

All on a dedicated website, with graphs, all in layman's terms for the public to see and how to read it should be compulsory education in school.

Alongside this, every MP should have a detailed breakdown of his or hers income to the last penny that they earn outside of politics, showing where and whom has paid them that money, including their own business endeavours. This might be seen as intrusive by some, but I believe when you become subservient to a countries electorate, these details matter for the elimination of corruption and possible treason.

You have politicians clearly gaining massive advantage in the stock market via possible insider trading and huge contracts being put on offer via corporation lobbying. This should not be allowed in any democratic system in my opinion.
 
Kompany Car said:
It was interesting to hear what Richard Murphy had to say only a few minutes after the press conference.

Click to expand...

If im honest most of the mechanisms he talked about went over my head but for some time ive felt we needed some bravery and a more radical approach. People gave a sigh of relief when the Tories got booted and so did I.
We seem to be in this spiral of tax increase and borrowing which dampens people's spending with the added pain of inflation and highish interest rates. We need to break the cycle, get some consumer confidence and invest. We need to be bold.
Economically they are just too close to the Tories austerity plans.
The bits and bobs they have done will hardly be felt by the masses.

Answers on a postcard chaps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top