Jamie Carragher

BLUE THUNDER said:
He should be banned.
If he's not, we should plonk the ****. He can't be getting away with this slander.
Click to expand...
Been saying this for years but City prefer the ‘holistic’ approach and will continue to roll out the red carpet for him.

His obsession with us is quite astounding at this point. Every time he’s in front of a keyboard he can’t type ‘115’ quick enough.
 
argyle said:
For those comments on the charges he should be banned from the ground.

The Forest owner did it to Neville. City should do it to him.

However City will do nothing, as usual.
Click to expand...

City are playing the 'taking the higher ground' game and have been for years.

Banning him from the away end during the week was cited as a safety move, rather than a character/opinion based one.

They were damn right too, and I think people don't fully appreciate it. He could have felt empowered in a loud away end after a few pretend beers to make provicative gestures, affect songs etc. Whether in shit banter or malice, doesnt really matter, in a potentially charged atmosphere. Which could have pissed off City fans and before you know it the dortmund fans think they have an issue with them and it escalates between two groups for no real reason.

It was a good call by the club and I don't think they were even trying to send any messages or show any teeth, I think it was a purely black and white safety assessment.

Fwiw while I am saying I thought it was the right move, I am not saying I agree with their general 'higher ground' approach btw.
 
Last edited:
Ajm1985 said:
Good. He's an attention seeking gimp whose analysis has veered from dogshit takes to intentionally incendiary 'hottakes'.
Click to expand...

Even as a shitty attempt at a joke, suggesting Kate Scott has cheated on her husband on national TV should have had him fired.

Hes a fucking embarrassment and I have no interest in anything he says.
 
The problem is, the club won't ban him, we should tell sky that we don't want him at any of our home games on sky, tell them the reason why and also say that he as a presenter he could of incited trouble. Also tell cbs he won't be allowed to come to our ground, but unfortunately we will welcome him with open arms feed him and then listen to him
 
Burtonblue said:
Just imagine if Joleon or Micah were spotted trying to get into the Madrid end at Anfield.
They would have been vilified by the media and have death threats from the dipper cult for daring not to show support for an English club.
Does this idiot not realise the relevance of impartiality in sports punditry?? Clearly not.
Massive thundercunt.
Click to expand...
Erm, do you watch any of our televised CL away games with the sound on?
 
Coatigan said:
City are playing the 'taking the higher ground' game and have been for years.

Banning him from the away end during the week was cited as a safety move, rather than a character/opinion based one.

They were damn right too, and I think people don't fully appreciate it. He could have felt empowered in a loud away end after a few pretend beers to make provicative gestures, affect songs etc. Whether in shit banter or malice, doesnt really matter, in a potentially charged atmosphere. Which could have pissed off City fans and before you know it the dortmund fans think they have an issue with them and it escalates between two groups for no real reason.

It was a good call by the club and I don't think they were even trying to send any messages or show any teeth, I think it was a purely black and white safety assessment.

Fwiw while I am saying I thought it was the right move, I am not saying I agree with their general 'higher ground' approach btw.
Click to expand...
It is unbelievable that any broadcaster should employ a pundit who sees part of his role as taunting opposition fans. Given the the toxic atmosphere at some grounds (see Villa Park) it is just stupid to antagonise people. This is not banter this is just incitement at a time when the country is ridden with an unpredictable undercurrent of violence. It doesn’t take much to spark a riot these days.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
It is unbelievable that any broadcaster should employ a pundit who sees part of his role as taunting opposition fans. Given the the toxic atmosphere at some grounds (see Villa Park) it is just stupid to antagonise people. This is not banter this is just incitement at a time when the country is ridden with an unpredictable undercurrent of violence. It doesn’t take much to spark a riot these days.
Click to expand...

The majority of their customers want them to attack us at every opportunity, in fact that clown Richards got the job solely because he would do just that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top