Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 10,417
For such a big club they are so small.
EDIT: Yes they are...Are the rats still moaning about the disallowed goal? Good!
1 hour special incommingView attachment 174567
Victims living up to their name.
I’m glad it was ruled out. I’d be annoyed if it was against us though.
By trying to get out of the way of it, he’s made himself active. Seems counter productive and one of those things that have gone for us today.
Anonymous..? I didn't know he was on the pitch...Thais was a thrilling performance and I’ve not enjoyed a Sunday Evening so much in a long time. Se were streets ahead of the scousers and yet they were praised to the skies for rebuiilding while ‘on top’. At a cost of a mere halo a billón! But they have replaced the wrong players…. With the wrong players? Salah looke depressed even before Nico got at him! Van Dyk was all over the place. Of the new players Wirtz lasted 80 mins before being subbed. He had looked nowhere near the level of any City midfielder. Ekitiké was subbed after a completely anonymous 50 odd mins. Where were the others. If Liverpool couldn’t compete in the market before, £500m later they sure as Hell can’t now. Great day!
I don't see the confusion. He is offside. He moves. He therefore commits an action offside.
He may or may not be impacting the line of vision, but he is without doubt impacting play. If he doesn't move, the ball either hits him and doesnt go in. Or it hits him and goes in, but then is disallowed because he was offside. So his action interfere.
EDIT: Yes they are...
Haaland’s due to score there.Fucking main news story on sly sports, they even had stuttering karveh, well, stuttering. Apparently the dippers haven’t complained for themselves but for the good of the game, bless em. Fucking help us at candlefield later in the season
It’s not as simple as that though. Bernardo also moves when Stones scores last season.I don't see the confusion. He is offside. He moves. He therefore commits an action offside.
He may or may not be impacting the line of vision, but he is without doubt impacting play. If he doesn't move, the ball either hits him and doesnt go in. Or it hits him and goes in, but then is disallowed because he was offside. So his action interferes.
Yeah, imagine if Liverpool conceded a goal caused by an opponent pushing the goalie when he was in the air, making him miss his punch, like happened to us recently.Why is it when a decision goes against the red scousers it’s a travesty and the media go all in calling it out,strange when decisions go against City or other teams it’s deemed as one of those things and it evens itself out over the season or just the shrug of the shoulders and get on with it ..
Had greatest hits radio on in the car and it was on that too. No escape ffs. Christ, it’s relentless.Fucking main news story on sly sports, they even had stuttering karveh, well, stuttering. Apparently the dippers haven’t complained for themselves but for the good of the game, bless em. Fucking help us at candlefield later in the season
dont want to lose customers like the sun didHad greatest hits radio on in the car and it was on that too. No escape ffs. Christ, it’s relentless.